2021
DOI: 10.21744/lingcure.v5ns4.1771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peculiarities of teaching a foreign language to lawyers students

Abstract: The language of law is a technical language, different from other technical languages such as mathematics or physics, as it is bound to the national legal system and has its own highly specialised terminology. In a language of special communication, the text is expressed in a special language or sub-language that is subject to specific syntactic, semantic and pragmatic rules. Purpose of the study: To examine the specific features of teaching a foreign language to lawyers students. A systematic review can be ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are reports corroborating this view even among language learners, who consider vocabulary learning in a legal English course to be the crucial communication-enabling element (see e.g., Sierocka et al, 2018). Other characteristics of English as it is used in this field, including its specific syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic features (Starostina & Horytska, 2021), as well as the discourse of the field (Charrow et al, 2015;Gémar, 2001), are to be included in a comprehensive ESP legal context and should permeate communicative language learning activities. As previously mentioned, the choice and extent of the learning activities aimed at a particular language skill have to depend on the identified needs of the learners, therefore a different emphasis is expected in different contexts (regarding study levels, study programmes, or even individual courses).…”
Section: Call and Esp (In English For Legal Purposes)mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There are reports corroborating this view even among language learners, who consider vocabulary learning in a legal English course to be the crucial communication-enabling element (see e.g., Sierocka et al, 2018). Other characteristics of English as it is used in this field, including its specific syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic features (Starostina & Horytska, 2021), as well as the discourse of the field (Charrow et al, 2015;Gémar, 2001), are to be included in a comprehensive ESP legal context and should permeate communicative language learning activities. As previously mentioned, the choice and extent of the learning activities aimed at a particular language skill have to depend on the identified needs of the learners, therefore a different emphasis is expected in different contexts (regarding study levels, study programmes, or even individual courses).…”
Section: Call and Esp (In English For Legal Purposes)mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There are reports corroborating this view even among language learners, who consider vocabulary learning in a legal English course to be the crucial communication-enabling element (see e.g., Sierocka et al, 2018). Other characteristics of English as it is used in this field, including its specific syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic features (Starostina & Horytska, 2021), as well as the discourse of the field (Charrow et al, 2015;Gémar, 2001), are to be included in a comprehensive ESP legal context and should permeate communicative language learning activities. As previously mentioned, the choice and extent of the learning activities aimed at a particular language skill have to depend on the identified needs of the learners, therefore a different emphasis is expected in different contexts (regarding study levels, study programmes, or even individual courses).…”
Section: Call and Esp (In English For Legal Purposes)mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There are reports corroborating this view even among language learners, who consider vocabulary learning in a legal English course to be the crucial communication-enabling element (see e.g., Sierocka et al, 2018). Other characteristics of English as it is used in this field, including its specific syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic features (Starostina & Horytska, 2021), as well as the discourse of the field (Charrow et al, 2015;Gémar, 2001), are to be included in a comprehensive ESP legal context and should permeate communicative language learning activities. As previously mentioned, the choice and extent of the learning activities aimed at a particular language skill have to depend on the identified needs of the learners, therefore a different emphasis is expected in different contexts (regarding study levels, study programmes, or even individual courses).…”
Section: Call and Esp (In English For Legal Purposes)mentioning
confidence: 93%