2011
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msr033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patterns of Genetic Variation Within and Between Gibbon Species

Abstract: Gibbons are small, arboreal, highly endangered apes that are understudied compared with other hominoids. At present, there are four recognized genera and approximately 17 species, all likely to have diverged from each other within the last 5–6 My. Although the gibbon phylogeny has been investigated using various approaches (i.e., vocalization, morphology, mitochondrial DNA, karyotype, etc.), the precise taxonomic relationships are still highly debated. Here, we present the first survey of nuclear sequence vari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
38
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
9
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with this scenario we hypothesized that the HyA was heterozygous for variant forms of chromosomes 6, 8, 9, and 18, as reported in Figure 3. Our results are in agreement with the pattern found by Matsudaira and Ishida (2010) who sequenced the full mtDNA of the genera Hylobates, Nomascus, and Syndactylus and with Kim et al (2011), who based their conclusions on 60 kb of sequence data from a panel of 19 gibbons representing nine species from all four genera.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In agreement with this scenario we hypothesized that the HyA was heterozygous for variant forms of chromosomes 6, 8, 9, and 18, as reported in Figure 3. Our results are in agreement with the pattern found by Matsudaira and Ishida (2010) who sequenced the full mtDNA of the genera Hylobates, Nomascus, and Syndactylus and with Kim et al (2011), who based their conclusions on 60 kb of sequence data from a panel of 19 gibbons representing nine species from all four genera.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The family Hylobatidae is monophyletic with predominantly strongly supported (100% bootstrap support) and each of the three genera with multiple species also show monophyly with high support (98-100% bootstrap support). At this point, our result is consistent with all previous result, including numerous morphological and molecular studies on the phylogenetic relationships among Hylobatidae members (Hayashi et al, 1995;Müller et al, 2003;Brandon-Jones et al, 2004;Takacs et al, 2005;Monda et al, 2007;Whittaker et al, 2007;Matsudaira and Ishida, 2010;Kim et al, 2011;Chan et al, 2012;Meyer et al, 2012;Wall et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The mitochondrial phylogeny of the three gibbon genera, Nomascus, Symphalangus, and Hylobates, based on the 9 concatenated protein coding genes was identical to that based on the whole mitochondrial genome (Hayashi et al, 1995;Müller et al, 2003;Brandon-Jones et al, 2004;Takacs et al, 2005;Monda et al, 2007;Whittaker et al, 2007;Chan et al, 2010;Matsudaira and Ishida, 2010;Kim et al, 2011;Chan et al, 2012;Meyer et al, 2012;Finstermeier et al, 2013;Wall et al, 2013). However, previous phylogenetic studies using the whole mitochondrial genome, Matsudaira and Ishida (2010) and Finstermeier et al (2013) both included only one Nomascus species.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The phylogenetic relationship of these genera is still not clear probably because of the relatively short time span in which their lineages diverged, and some additional factors such as gene flow among species (Van Ngoc et al, 2010;Kim et al, 2011). In our discussion below, we consider three of them (Symphalangus, Hylobates and Nomascus) because the materials we used in the present study were from species of these three genera.…”
Section: Telomere Region In An Apementioning
confidence: 99%