2002
DOI: 10.1097/00130832-200208000-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patients with negative skin tests

Abstract: With the present understanding of venom allergy, the practising clinician is not infrequently faced with the dilemma of the skin test negative patient. Once other identifiable causes have been carefully ruled out, referral to a specialized center for deliberate sting-challenges appears in selected cases to be a medically appropriate and ethically justified management approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific production of IgE has normally been demonstrated via indirect ELISA, RAST, or Western blot, which is predicated on the principles of the immunochemical binding reaction. However, the levels of specific IgE measured via immunochemical methods have not been correlated with the severity of allergies, which has led to the suggestion that some specific IgE cannot be immunochemically detected (van Ree and Aalberse, 1999;Kontou-Fili, 2002). Marie et al (1999) determined that the application of biological methods, including the skin prick test, contributed to the reduction of false positives for the detection of specific IgE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific production of IgE has normally been demonstrated via indirect ELISA, RAST, or Western blot, which is predicated on the principles of the immunochemical binding reaction. However, the levels of specific IgE measured via immunochemical methods have not been correlated with the severity of allergies, which has led to the suggestion that some specific IgE cannot be immunochemically detected (van Ree and Aalberse, 1999;Kontou-Fili, 2002). Marie et al (1999) determined that the application of biological methods, including the skin prick test, contributed to the reduction of false positives for the detection of specific IgE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AAI prescription in patients with anaphylactic sting reactions and negative testing for venom-specific IgE Even though IgE-negative anaphylaxis has been reported by several investigators, epidemiological data are scarce (82)(83)(84). The percentage seems to be very low when additional diagnostic tests are performed (e.g., basophil activation test, component-resolved diagnostics).…”
Section: Indication For Aai Prescription In Untreated Patients With Sarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may represent a low level of IgE production or lack of sensitivity to currently available test reagents or methods. In such subjects, skin and in vitro tests should be repeated within several months after the initial tests are completed 30,31…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%