2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient tolerance of rectal balloons in conformal radiation treatment of prostate cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, an endorectal balloon serves as an internal immobilization device and might protect the rectum by moving portions of the posterior and superior rectum away from the treatment field. The balloon has been well tolerated during the treatment course (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, an endorectal balloon serves as an internal immobilization device and might protect the rectum by moving portions of the posterior and superior rectum away from the treatment field. The balloon has been well tolerated during the treatment course (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Second, the clinical use and tolerability of an ERB during treatment has been extensively described (19,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28). The use of the ERB adds only few (range, [3][4][5] minutes to the whole RT procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performing imaging without an ERC would have a number of advantages, including less patient discomfort, lower costs, and better correlation with RT planning, if the latter has been performed without an endorectal balloon (ERB). However, the use of an ERB in localized prostate RT has been proved advantageous (19,(23)(24)(25)(26) and well tolerated (27,28). For RT planning and during RT sessions, ERBs that are similar to the ERC in construction and shape can be used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in those who received protons alone (= local) compared with combination treatment (local ? pelvic) could be detected (Ronson et al 2006). …”
Section: Application and Patient's Tolerancementioning
confidence: 93%