2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-007-0154-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient safety issues in magnetic resonance imaging: state of the art

Abstract: The presence of a static magnetic field (Bo), a radiofrequency field (RF), a dynamic gradient which varies in time and loud noises during an MR examination could increase patient risk. Specifically, a magnetic field could interfere with ferromagnetic material leading to one of the following five dangerous interactions: 1) projectile effect, 2) twisting, 3) burning, 4) artefacts and 5) device malfunction. The projectile effect is when an object is attracted by the magnet with the risk, as reported in literature… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While MRI is generally considered a safe diagnostic procedure, most incidents have occurred in patients with metallic implants [4,22]. Excessive radiofrequency-induced heating can be a concern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While MRI is generally considered a safe diagnostic procedure, most incidents have occurred in patients with metallic implants [4,22]. Excessive radiofrequency-induced heating can be a concern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic field of the equipment used for magnetic resonance imaging reacts to the detection of metal in 5 dangerous ways: projectile objects, twisting displacement of implants, burning, monitoring artifacts, and device malfunction. 62,63 Medical devices currently contraindicated for magnetic resonance imaging include pulmonary artery catheters, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, pacemakers, ventricular assist devices, and intraaortic balloon pumps. 63 Technology is constantly changing with respect to medical devices and safety of magnetic resonance imaging.…”
Section: Wherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the conventional 1.5-and 3-Tesla machine, no clinically significant fetal effects have been reported [11]. The MRI should be avoided in the first half of pregnancy, particularly at < 18 menstrual weeks'.…”
Section: Safety Of Fetal Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%