2019
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient‐reported sexual quality of life after different types of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy: Analysis of a population‐based prospective cohort

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Although patients with prostate cancer face many treatment options, to the authors' knowledge the comparative effects of different surgical and radiotherapy (RT) options on sexual function are unclear. METHODS: In the current study, a population-based cohort of 835 men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer from 2011 through 2013 was recruited throughout North Carolina in collaboration with the Rapid Case Ascertainment system of the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry. All men were enrolled prior … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combined interval fell to the left of the invalid line ( p = 0.008), demonstrating that the sexual function of localized PCa was less affected by BT than EBRT by the EPIC scale. In the three articles using the PCSI scale ( Chen et al, 2017 ; Jia and Zhang, 2018 ; Mullins et al, 2019 ), no heterogeneity was observed (I 2 = 0%), using the fixed-effects model. The test for overall effect showed that Z = 0.05, SMD = 0.00, 95% CI: −0.14 to 0.15, the merged interval crossed the invalid line, and there was no significant difference ( p = 0.96).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The combined interval fell to the left of the invalid line ( p = 0.008), demonstrating that the sexual function of localized PCa was less affected by BT than EBRT by the EPIC scale. In the three articles using the PCSI scale ( Chen et al, 2017 ; Jia and Zhang, 2018 ; Mullins et al, 2019 ), no heterogeneity was observed (I 2 = 0%), using the fixed-effects model. The test for overall effect showed that Z = 0.05, SMD = 0.00, 95% CI: −0.14 to 0.15, the merged interval crossed the invalid line, and there was no significant difference ( p = 0.96).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, the follow-up plan was defined appropriately before the evaluation of the sexual function and implemented as scheduled. Three studies ( Ferrer et al, 2008 ; Chen et al, 2017 ; Mullins et al, 2019 ) independently evaluated the results using a blind method; four clinical trials ( Ferrer et al, 2008 ; Guedea et al, 2009 ; van Tol-Geerdink et al, 2013 ; Chen et al, 2017 ) specified the missing rate at the beginning or described the lost visits after the trial; and five studies ( Ferrer et al, 2008 ; Pardo et al, 2010 ; Ferrer et al, 2013 ; Jia and Zhang, 2018 ; Mullins et al, 2019 ) performed stratified or covariate analysis to control for confounding bias, as shown in Figures 2A,B , where “green” represents low risk, “yellow” represents unknown risk, and “red” represents high risk.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies of prostate cancer survivors have reported on the outcomes associated with sexual function, urinary or bowel incontinence, or the emotional side effects after treatment ( 29 , 30 ). Our study contributes to a gap in research on the physical health and behavioral risk factors of prostate cancer survivors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incidence of post-treatment ED in prostate cancer can vary from 24% (brachytherapy alone), 40% (brachytherapy plus external beam radiotherapy [EBRT]), 45% (EBRT alone), 66% (nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy [RP]), 75% (non-nerve sparing RP), and 87% for cryosurgery [ 1 ]. Recently in a population based study patient reported sexual outcome after different types of prostate cancer treatment were reported [ 2 ]. Sexual dysfunction after treatment was related to pre-treatment potency, age and type of treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%