Patient-reported feedback promotes delivery of smoking cessation advice by dental professionals

Rosseel, J. P.; Jacobs, Jurgen; Hilberink, Sander R.; Segaar, Dewi; Akkermans, Reinier; Maassen, Irma; Plasschaert, A.J.M.; Grol, Richard

doi:10.1080/14635240.2012.661958

Cited by 2 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Of the included studies, seven studies were from the UK [39–42, 48, 50, 52], six studies were from the USA [43–46, 51, 53], one study was from Finland [47] and one study was from the Netherlands [49]. Included studies were published between 2004 and 2018.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A total of seven included studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) [39, 42, 44–47, 53], of which six were cluster randomised [39, 42, 44, 46, 47, 53] and one was individually randomised [45]. The remaining eight studies followed quasi-experimental designs, with seven being pretest-posttest quasi-experimental studies [40, 41, 43, 48, 49, 51, 52] and one being a non-equivalent groups design [50]. Out of all 15 studies, six involved implementation of interdisciplinary guidelines related to tobacco cessation into the dental setting [43, 44, 46, 47, 49, 51], and the rest explored the implementation of general dental guidelines [39–42, 45, 48, 50, 52, 53].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The remaining eight studies followed quasi-experimental designs, with seven being pretest-posttest quasi-experimental studies [40, 41, 43, 48, 49, 51, 52] and one being a non-equivalent groups design [50]. Out of all 15 studies, six involved implementation of interdisciplinary guidelines related to tobacco cessation into the dental setting [43, 44, 46, 47, 49, 51], and the rest explored the implementation of general dental guidelines [39–42, 45, 48, 50, 52, 53]. Implementation strategies employed in each study were classified into the following categories: audit and feedback ( n = 4) [39–42], reminders ( n = 4) [42–45], education ( n = 3) [46–48], patient-mediated interventions ( n = 2) [45, 49], pay for performance ( n = 1) [50] and multifaceted interventions ( n = 5) [42, 47, 51–53].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Despite this, one RCT was able to implement a study design that permitted blinding [46]. Three of the eight included quasi-experimental studies was of high quality [49–51], with four being of moderate quality [40, 41, 43, 52], and one being of poor quality [48] (Table 5). Quasi-experimental studies had an average score of 74.08%.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The 12 studies classified into single intervention categories involved interventions classified as audit and feedback ( n = 4) [39–42], reminders ( n = 4) [42–45], education ( n = 3) [46–48], patient-mediated interventions ( n = 2) [45, 49] and pay for performance ( n = 1) [50].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

The effectiveness of guideline implementation strategies in the dental setting: a systematic review

Villarosa¹,

Maneze²,

Ramjan³

et al. 2019

Implementation Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundGuideline implementation has been an ongoing challenge in the dental practice setting. Despite this, there are no reviews summarising the existing evidence regarding effective guideline implementation strategies in this setting. In order to address this, this systematic review examines the effectiveness of guideline implementation strategies in the dental practice setting.MethodsA systematic search was undertaken according to the PRISMA statement across nine electronic databases, targeting randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies which evaluated the effectiveness of guideline implementation strategies in improving guideline adherence in the dental setting. All records were independently examined for relevance and appraised for study quality by two authors, with consensus achieved by a third author. Data were extracted from included studies using a standardised data extraction pro forma.ResultsA total of 15 records were eligible for inclusion in this review, which focused on the effects of audit and feedback, reminders, education, patient-mediated interventions, pay for performance and multifaceted interventions. Although there were some conflicting evidence, studies within each category of implementation strategy indicated a positive effect on guideline adherence.ConclusionsThis study has identified education, reminders and multifaceted interventions as effective implementation strategies for the dental practice setting. Although this is similar to research findings from other health sectors, there is some evidence to suggest patient-mediated interventions may be less effective and pay for performance may be more effective in the dental setting. These findings can inform policy makers, professional associations, colleges and organisations in the future adoption of clinical guidelines in the dental practice setting.Trial registrationThis systematic review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), registration ID CRD42018093023.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The effectiveness of guideline implementation strategies in the dental setting: a systematic review

Villarosa¹,

Maneze²,

Ramjan³

et al. 2019

Implementation Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

General dental practitioners' knowledge and opinions of snoring and sleep-related breathing disorders

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims There is increasing recognition that sleep disturbances can affect lifestyle, economy and health. General dental practitioners (GDPs) can play a vital role in helping to identify at-risk patients through screening as well as aid in the management of these conditions. The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge of UK-based GDPs in relation to sleep-related breathing disorders (SRBDs).Material and methods A questionnaire was developed to assess GDPs' knowledge of SRBDs and their current practice in relation to the management of SRBDs, and identify the factors associated with improved knowledge and management. A volunteer sample was recruited from social media platforms and conference attendees.Results In total, 152 GDPs completed the questionnaire; 101 (66% [95% CI 59%,74%]) agreed that GDPs should ask their patients about sleep disorders, while only 82 (54% [95% CI 46%,62%]) confirmed that they actually asked their patients about the problem. On a 22-point knowledge scale, the mean score was 12.93 (95%CI 12.23, 13.63). Postgraduate education (F = 5.47; p = 0.001), increasing age (r = 0.23; p = 0.005) and GDP workplace (F = 4.98; p = 0.008) contributed to a higher knowledge score. GDPs were strongly in favour of having more information (N = 141; 93% [95% CI 87%,97%]).Conclusion Although GDPs' knowledge of SRBDs was better than anticipated, they clearly felt a need for further information and training. There is a compelling case to include this subject in the undergraduate dental curriculum.

show abstract

Patient-reported feedback promotes delivery of smoking cessation advice by dental professionals

Cited by 2 publications

References 15 publications

The effectiveness of guideline implementation strategies in the dental setting: a systematic review

The effectiveness of guideline implementation strategies in the dental setting: a systematic review

General dental practitioners' knowledge and opinions of snoring and sleep-related breathing disorders

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About