Patient‐reported effect in patients receiving implant or tooth‐supported fixed prosthesis

Özhayat, Esben Boeskov; Gotfredsen, Klaus

doi:10.1111/joor.12880

Cited by 13 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It is not a new observation and in accordance with other publications, that patient satisfaction is reported high after prosthetic rehabilitation (Ozhayat & Gotfredsen, 2012, 2019, 2020). The previous assumption that immediate or early loading would satisfy the patient more than delayed loading was not general.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

Patient’s perception of timing concepts in implant dentistry: A systematic review

Gotfredsen

Hosseini

Rimborg³

et al. 2021

Clinical Oral Implants Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Protocols for implant dentistry, most frequently include periods until healing of the extraction sockets and osseointegration of the implant. Deductional thinking imply that patients would prefer if treatment time in implant dentistry were reduced. Aim What is the patient perception of immediate or early implant placement or loading in comparison with traditional, delayed placement, and/or loading assessed by patient‐reported outcome measures, as evidenced in randomized controlled clinical trials or prospective controlled studies? Material and methods A systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines with a literature search up to June 30. All hits were imported into Rayyan online software and analyzed by two authors for eligibility. Cochrane RoB2.0 and Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale were used to evaluate risk of bias in the individual studies. Results Of the initially 1439 articles, 76 underwent full‐text analysis and finally 40 articles, representing 35 cohort studies, were included. The quality evaluation demonstrated some concerns among most of the studies. Conclusion a) There is no strong evidence to support that the time for implant placement or loading of implant‐supported single or short‐span reconstructions or overdentures influence patients´ discomfort, satisfaction with function or esthetics or overall satisfaction with the implant treatment. b) There is some evidence that studies including edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant‐supported full‐arch FDPs demonstrate more satisfied patients with immediate than for the early or delayed loaded implant reconstructions after short time, but the difference is not clear one year after treatment.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 86%

Patient’s perception of timing concepts in implant dentistry: A systematic review

Gotfredsen

Hosseini

Rimborg³

et al. 2021

Clinical Oral Implants Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although occlusal force was stated to be similar between those who are dentate and restored with implant supported prostheses, [98][99][100] comparison of patient reported outcomes of tooth supported versus implant supported prostheses are not significantly different, as found in a cohort study of 155 subjects and validated by OHIP 14 (Fig 1). 101 The materials used for construction of implant supported prostheses can be demonstrated to receive impact differently. 102,103 For instance, acrylic resin veneered surfaces do dampen some of the impact in comparison to metal-ceramic direct transmission to peri-implant bone.…”

Section: Tooth Versus Implant Supported Prosthesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although occlusal force was stated to be similar between those who are dentate and restored with implant supported prostheses, 98–100 comparison of patient reported outcomes of tooth supported versus implant supported prostheses are not significantly different, as found in a cohort study of 155 subjects and validated by OHIP 14 (Fig 1). 101 …”

Section: Focus Question 2: Do Patients With the Following Characterismentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Patient Specific Factors on Occlusal Forces Generated: Best Evidence Consensus Statement

Lee

Salinas

Wiens

2021

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The purpose of this Best Evidence Consensus Statement was to search the literature to determine if there is a relationship between patient specific factors and occlusal force. Materials and Methods: A literature review was conducted in the following databases: Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews (EBMR), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, and Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print. Articles on patient factors and occlusal force were compiled by using a combination of the key words: "bite force," "occlusal force," "partial and complete edentulism," "bruxism," and "orthognathic class." Inclusion criteria included meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, case series, and journal articles. Exclusion criteria were case reports, studies in children, animals, and bench studies. Results: Of the 1502 articles that met the initial search criteria, 97 related to patientspecific factors affecting occlusal forces. These articles were evaluated, rated, and organized into appropriate categories addressing questions of foci. Conclusions: The range of occlusal force is highly variable among subjects correlated to patient specific factors such as age, gender, partial and complete edentulism, the presence of a maxillofacial defect, location of edentulous area, orthognathic profile, and magnitude of occlusal vertical dimension. Tooth replacement therapies targeted at increasing occlusal contact seem to have a positive effect on increasing occlusal force. Bruxism does not necessarily demonstrate higher occlusal powering but may have greater tooth contact time. Occlusal force is not clearly affected by the type of dental restoration or restorative material used. The clinical significance of the changes in occlusal forces is yet to be determined.

show abstract

“…Several studies used OHIP-14 in Denmark. The majority [22][23][24] used the original English OHIP-14, whereas one study [25] reported using a translated Danish version (with no reference provided) and another study [26] reported the translation of the OHIP-49 into Danish, but without following the guidelines for translation and cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires [27]. In the literature, there is neither a published nor a validated Danish version.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Danish version of the oral health impact profile-14 (OHIP-14): translation and cross-cultural adaptation

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire assesses quality of life related to people’s perception of oral disorders on their well-being. However, a translated and validated Danish version of OHIP-14 is not yet available. The purpose of this pilot study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the English version of the OHIP-14 into Danish (OHIP-14-DK). In addition, to assess its content and face validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Methods The English version of OHIP-14 was translated into Danish following a standard protocol of cross-cultural adaptation. Stages I-IV: translation phase to generate a pre-final version “OHIP-14-DK”. Stage V: pre-testing phase. A random sample of 22 orthodontic patients (mean age 24.7 years, SD ±14.8; 14 females, 8 males) were selected at the Section of Orthodontics, Aarhus University, Denmark. All patients self-completed the OHIP-14-DK and were then interviewed to assess its content and face validity. Internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. All patients completed the same questionnaire again at a one-week interval. Test-retest reliability was assessed using Spearman’s correlation coefficient and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Results The initial and back translations were very similar: the OHIP-14-DK proved to have a good level of equivalence with no translation errors or deviations. Furthermore, the OHIP-14-DK seemed well-adapted to Danish culture and was understood by individuals down to 12 years of age. Pre-testing demonstrated good face and content validity; interviews had a response rate of 100% and confirmed that each item was understandable without inducing reluctance or hesitation. Thus, responses were related to their corresponding item. Therefore, no final adjustments were required for the pre-tested version. Cronbach’s alpha for the OHIP-14-DK subscales fell in the 0.75–0.84 range, indicating an adequate-to-good internal consistency. Spearman’s correlation coefficient for the OHIP-14-DK total score was 0.77. The ICC for the OHIP-14-DK total score was 0.91. Conclusions The OHIP-14-DK seems well adapted to Danish culture, proved to be face and content valid and also showed good internal consistency and excellent reliability. However, its psychometric properties still need to be tested. Study registration Not applicable

show abstract

Patient‐reported effect in patients receiving implant or tooth‐supported fixed prosthesis

Cited by 13 publications

References 24 publications

Patient’s perception of timing concepts in implant dentistry: A systematic review

Patient’s perception of timing concepts in implant dentistry: A systematic review

The Effect of Patient Specific Factors on Occlusal Forces Generated: Best Evidence Consensus Statement

A Danish version of the oral health impact profile-14 (OHIP-14): translation and cross-cultural adaptation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About