2018
DOI: 10.3390/s18041293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Path Diversity Improved Opportunistic Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks

Abstract: The packets carried along a pre-defined route in underwater sensor networks are very vulnerble. Node mobility or intermittent channel availability easily leads to unreachable routing. Opportunistic routing has been proven to be a promising paradigm to design routing protocols for underwater sensor networks. It takes advantage of the broadcast nature of the wireless medium to combat packet losses and selects potential paths on the fly. Finding an appropriate forwarding candidate set is a key issue in opportunis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the next-hop forwarder does not receive the packet, it continues on re-transmission until the packet is successfully transmitted, or it discards the packet as soon as it reaches the maximum number of attempts allowed [25]. In opportunistic routing, a list of nodes is involved in advancing the packet towards the destination [26]. Once a packet is sent in the broadcast nature of the wireless medium, all the receiving nodes coordinate and prioritize the candidate set, such that a low priority node furthers the transmission if and only the higher priority candidate fails to do so.…”
Section: Opportunistic Routing In Uwsnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the next-hop forwarder does not receive the packet, it continues on re-transmission until the packet is successfully transmitted, or it discards the packet as soon as it reaches the maximum number of attempts allowed [25]. In opportunistic routing, a list of nodes is involved in advancing the packet towards the destination [26]. Once a packet is sent in the broadcast nature of the wireless medium, all the receiving nodes coordinate and prioritize the candidate set, such that a low priority node furthers the transmission if and only the higher priority candidate fails to do so.…”
Section: Opportunistic Routing In Uwsnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network is divided in logical cubes and a set of nodes is selected in each cube to forward the data packet. PICS and PRCS [18] use depth information and ToA to calculate the position of the sender and distance between the nodes. PICS uses two hops information to select the routing path, whereas PRCS uses only one hop information.…”
Section: Opportunistic Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PICS uses two hops information to select the routing path, whereas PRCS uses only one hop information. In order to select the candidate nodes to forward packets, a new metric named EEPA [18] (enhanced expected packet advance) is applied, which considers the channel quality and path correlation between two neighbors.…”
Section: Opportunistic Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For wireless multihop networks with lossy links, the opportunitybased routing algorithms have been proposed to enhance packet delivery ratio and throughput [12][13]. To reduce packet losses, these protocols uses the wireless channel and arbitrary routings for achieving contiguous diversity at the receiver [11][12][13][14][15][16]. To enhance the lifetime of the network and to elevate the energy efficiency, the energy competent cooperative routing approaches are preferred by various manufacturers and researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%