2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2225781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patent Applications and the Performance of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors stress the need of enacting data protection legislation in government [45]. Cotropia et al [46] looked at the data retention rules that are used to govern the secure storage and retrieval of electronic data in computer systems and recordable media in electronic information systems. The author suggested a software module for media management components that is responsible for data storage, archiving, and recovery, as well as keeping multiple copies of data and information systems.…”
Section: Cybersecurity Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors stress the need of enacting data protection legislation in government [45]. Cotropia et al [46] looked at the data retention rules that are used to govern the secure storage and retrieval of electronic data in computer systems and recordable media in electronic information systems. The author suggested a software module for media management components that is responsible for data storage, archiving, and recovery, as well as keeping multiple copies of data and information systems.…”
Section: Cybersecurity Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This policy is divided into three parts [46,78,79]: First utilizing emails as per user recommendations. This policy aims at clarifying what constitutes appropriate email usage, and to educate all employees on what constitutes acceptable and unacceptable email usage.…”
Section: Email Security Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 This is less clear since 2009, reason why we do not go beyond that year in the analysis of this variable. For an explanation on the exponential (and spurious) rise of the patents granted in the USA in the last years, see, for instance, Cotropia et al (2013). 4 For a detailed explanation on this, see Furman et al (2002, p.909) or Kortum (1996, 1999).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, there is evidence that the beneficial side-effects of patent grants for these entities are largely diminished by long grant lags-the delayed access to financing made possible by patent ownership can prove as damaging as the rejection of the application altogether (Farre-Mensa et al, 2019). While the USPTO announced "specific actions [they] have taken to help reduce the backlog" in 2011, 26 and the backlog has indeed decreased, the percentage of applications that are granted has risen at the same time (Cotropia et al, 2013). Therefore, the net effect of decreasing examination time allotments may simply be a reduction in grant lags at the expense of increasing levels of litigation when these weaker, expedited patents are challenged in court-arguably an even greater source of inefficiency in the innovation system (Frakes and Wasserman, 2019).…”
Section: Weak Patentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…55 If new developments lie outside the scope of the original application, then follow-up applications such as continuations may be filed that all but supersede the initial filing, adding to the already large backlog of patent applications (Cotropia et al, 2013).…”
Section: Early Filing and Patent Obfuscationmentioning
confidence: 99%