2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-023-00789-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PatchResNet: Multiple Patch Division–Based Deep Feature Fusion Framework for Brain Tumor Classification Using MRI Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Al Kadi et al [22] focused on extracting histopathological features, without applying any segmentation method, and achieved an accuracy of 92% accuracy using a fuzzy clustering machine for classification. In contrast, Muezzinoglu et al [23] proposed the ResNet50 transfer learning technique, classifying multiple types of brain tumors with a 98% accuracy. Georgiardis et al [24] attained an accuracy of 93%, though segmentation was not part of their study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al Kadi et al [22] focused on extracting histopathological features, without applying any segmentation method, and achieved an accuracy of 92% accuracy using a fuzzy clustering machine for classification. In contrast, Muezzinoglu et al [23] proposed the ResNet50 transfer learning technique, classifying multiple types of brain tumors with a 98% accuracy. Georgiardis et al [24] attained an accuracy of 93%, though segmentation was not part of their study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNN-based approaches, exemplified by Talukder et al, 2023 [13] and Tabatabaei et al, 2023 [48] on the Figshare dataset with accuracies of 99.68% and 99.30%, respectively, demonstrate noteworthy efficacy. On the Kaggle dataset, alongside Proposed-Swin (ViT), other CNN-based models such as Rahman and Islam [82], Muezzinoglu et al [83], and Ali et al [84] also exhibit high accuracy rates. However, it is essential to highlight that Proposed-Swin (ViT) not only surpasses these CNN-based models but excels as a benchmark for superior performance in brain tumor classification.…”
Section: Comparison With Cutting-edge Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each layer, the feature maps of the previous layers were used as input and the feature maps of the current layers were produced as output. The CNN model has many advantages: it makes features more widespread and diversified through convolutional layers, reduces the number of parameters by pooling layers, and reduces overfitting problems through dropout layers [ 39 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%