1993
DOI: 10.1080/03610739308253926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Passage difficulty, speech rate, and age differences in memory for spoken text: Speech recall and the complexity hypothesis

Abstract: Memory for speech in young and elderly adults was studied by varying speech rate and average predictability of prose passages (measured by a "cloze" procedure). Increased speech rate and decreased predictability yielded poorer memory performance on three retention measures (free recall, cued recall, and multiple-choice recognition), confirming passage predictability as a good predictor of empirical difficulty of a speech passage. Older adults recalled less than young adults on all three measures, with increasi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is ample evidence that older adults suffer a differentially greater processing challenge from rapid speech than their younger counterparts, and that this challenge in turn is greater for extended narrative length passages than for short sentences (cf., Riggs, Wingfield, & Tun, 1993;Wingfield, Peelle, & Grossman, 2003). That these results reflect a strategic approach to discourse length material rather than a general response to all speech is supported by the contrast between the present results and findings for sentence-length material where older adults do show longer AMW pause latencies than young adults (Waters & Caplan, 2001;Fallon et al, under review).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…There is ample evidence that older adults suffer a differentially greater processing challenge from rapid speech than their younger counterparts, and that this challenge in turn is greater for extended narrative length passages than for short sentences (cf., Riggs, Wingfield, & Tun, 1993;Wingfield, Peelle, & Grossman, 2003). That these results reflect a strategic approach to discourse length material rather than a general response to all speech is supported by the contrast between the present results and findings for sentence-length material where older adults do show longer AMW pause latencies than young adults (Waters & Caplan, 2001;Fallon et al, under review).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…For those with poor hearing, reducing the rate of word presentation, for example by increasing the delay between words, can lead to better comprehension and better word recall (Stine et al, 1986; Riggs et al, 1993; Wingfield et al, 2006; Grimley, 2007). Conversely, reducing the time between words reduces intelligibility of passages, as would be expected if prior words are more often lost from memory when word frequency increases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Slowing the presentation rate of stimuli increases recall probability (Riggs et al, 1993; Wingfield et al, 1999). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the fact that the older adults showed poorer recall than the young, however, it could be argued that the older adults' preferred rates were inappropriately farther from their optimal rates than the rates selected by the young. Older adults are generally known to be at a disadvantage when information loads are high, whether the information load is manipulated by increasing speech rates or by varying the informational complexity of the speech (Riggs, Wingfield, & Tun, 1993). That is, at any given rate the information load will be proportionally higher for the older adults with consequent effects on comprehension and memory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%