Political Corruption 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315126647-59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Party Finance and Political Scandal: Comparing Italy, Spain, and France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Section 4 For an overview of the rules for political contributions in the U.S. and how they changed during the 2000s, see, for instance, Aggarwal et al (2012, 5-8). In France, donations by individuals and corporations were illegal but tolerated before 1988 and donations by corporations have been illegal since 1995 (Pujas and Rhodes 1999). 4 introduces the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section 4 For an overview of the rules for political contributions in the U.S. and how they changed during the 2000s, see, for instance, Aggarwal et al (2012, 5-8). In France, donations by individuals and corporations were illegal but tolerated before 1988 and donations by corporations have been illegal since 1995 (Pujas and Rhodes 1999). 4 introduces the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We’ve blown the past ethical standards; we now play on the legal standards.” The problem, as it is viewed by most scholars, is that private electoral funding alters the actions of political leaders in favor of the interests of donors, but they fail to question whether the use of these resources is an illicit practice. Only a few studies have explored the illegal problems that the electoral law brings about (Della Porta & Vannucci, 1999; Hofnung, 1996; Pujas & Rhodes, 2009). The main argument offered in these kinds of studies is that party finance regulations create opportunities for political corruption and even facilitate agreements with illegal groups who acquire a voice in public life through their electoral contributions.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%