2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2017.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle swarm optimization and its application to seismic inversion of igneous rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PSO is quite recent in the framework of geophysical data inversion (Shaw and Srivastava, 2007;Yuan et al, 2009) and is not yet as widely as the other global optimization methods mentioned previously. However, it was successfully applied to surface-wave analysis (Song et al, 2012;Wilken and Rabbel, 2012), traveltime tomography (Tronicke et al, 2012;Luu et al, 2016), seismic refraction (Poormirzaee et al, 2014), seismic wave impedance inversion in igneous rock (Yang et al, 2017) and multifrequency GPR inversion (Salucci et al, 2017). Furthermore, Song et al (2012) have shown, in a comparative analysis, that PSO outperforms genetic algorithm and Monte-Carlo methods in terms of reliability and computational efforts.…”
Section: D Inversion Using Particle Swarm Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PSO is quite recent in the framework of geophysical data inversion (Shaw and Srivastava, 2007;Yuan et al, 2009) and is not yet as widely as the other global optimization methods mentioned previously. However, it was successfully applied to surface-wave analysis (Song et al, 2012;Wilken and Rabbel, 2012), traveltime tomography (Tronicke et al, 2012;Luu et al, 2016), seismic refraction (Poormirzaee et al, 2014), seismic wave impedance inversion in igneous rock (Yang et al, 2017) and multifrequency GPR inversion (Salucci et al, 2017). Furthermore, Song et al (2012) have shown, in a comparative analysis, that PSO outperforms genetic algorithm and Monte-Carlo methods in terms of reliability and computational efforts.…”
Section: D Inversion Using Particle Swarm Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In geophysical inversion applications, the PSO algorithm has shown good performance in terms of global optimization ability, convergence rate, and robustness. PSO has been applied to direct current (DC) resistivity methods [37,38], seismic [39][40][41], streaming-potential [27], magnetic [33,42], gravity [43][44][45], airborne EM [46], AMT and MT data [29], and self-potential [47]. Furthermore, it has also been successfully used for an artificial neural network [48], reservoir characterization [49], and for big data research [50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang et al . (2017) proposed the PSO's application to seismic wave impedance inversion. Grandis and Maulana (2017) introduced PSO into the inversion of synthetic MT data and obtained one‐dimensional resistivity–depth variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shaw and Srivastava (2007) applied PSO to one-dimensional direct current (DC) and magnetotelluric (MT) sounding, to make theoretical geoelectric model data and measured geoelectric data inversion, respectively. Yang et al (2017) proposed the PSO's application to seismic wave impedance inversion. Grandis and Maulana (2017) introduced PSO into the inversion of synthetic MT data and obtained one-dimensional resistivity-depth variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%