2020
DOI: 10.1002/nsg.12129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient electromagnetic inversion based on particle swarm optimization and differential evolution algorithm

Abstract: For transient electromagnetic inversion, a gradient‐based algorithm is strongly dependent on the quality of the initial model, while any non‐gradient‐based algorithm often falls too easily into local optima. This paper proposes a joint differential‐evolution–particle‐swarm‐optimization inversion algorithm, which provides a better global optimization. A dual‐population evolution strategy and information exchange mechanism is presented. For verification, this is followed by adoption of a layered inversion model … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As depicted in Figure 3, for the selection of [δ i,min , δ i,max ], it primarily depends on two factors: one is selecting appropriate upper and lower boundary values based on the required layering accuracy in actual exploration, and the other considers the fact that the inversion accuracy of transient electromagnetic data gradually decreases with increasing depth. Hence, the threshold value for the change in layer thickness is set to increase with depth (e.g., during synthetic data simulation, it is set as within 200 M, more than 200 M, and more than 400 M of predicted depth, and the layer thickness thresholds are set to [5,25], [10,50], and [20,100], respectively). Second, since transient electromagnetic inversion exhibits highly nonlinear characteristics, introducing a regularization constraint for model smoothing is crucial to reduce false anomalies and enhance the model fitting effect.…”
Section: Piecewise Regularized Inversion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As depicted in Figure 3, for the selection of [δ i,min , δ i,max ], it primarily depends on two factors: one is selecting appropriate upper and lower boundary values based on the required layering accuracy in actual exploration, and the other considers the fact that the inversion accuracy of transient electromagnetic data gradually decreases with increasing depth. Hence, the threshold value for the change in layer thickness is set to increase with depth (e.g., during synthetic data simulation, it is set as within 200 M, more than 200 M, and more than 400 M of predicted depth, and the layer thickness thresholds are set to [5,25], [10,50], and [20,100], respectively). Second, since transient electromagnetic inversion exhibits highly nonlinear characteristics, introducing a regularization constraint for model smoothing is crucial to reduce false anomalies and enhance the model fitting effect.…”
Section: Piecewise Regularized Inversion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, Yang et al [8] utilized the damping least squares method for inverting transient electromagnetic data originating from conical sources; however, this type of inversion method requires a high-quality initial model and is prone to getting stuck in local optima. In contrast, nonlinear inversion approaches involve designing the initial model directly based on a priori information, as seen in works by Wang et al [9] and Li et al [10]. These methods are efficient but heavily dependent on the quality of a priori information, which can be challenging to obtain in large-area exploration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the differences and complementarities among different non‐linear optimization algorithms can be comprehensively utilized, the combination of different global‐searching non‐linear algorithms can not only achieve the complementary advantages between the algorithms, but also open up a new way for the inversion of complex multi‐mode dispersion curves. At present, the combination of various optimization algorithms has been proposed in different fields for specific problems, such as the combination of ANN and flower pollination algorithm to solve the seismic refraction data analysis (Poormirzaee et al., 2022), the combination of GA and PSO to solve the neural network reservoir permeability prediction problem (Ahmadi et al., 2013) and the combination of PSO and differential evolution algorithm to solve transient electromagnetic inversion (Li et al., 2021). Although the combination of global‐searching non‐linear algorithms has achieved some practical application results, there are still some problems that have not been completely solved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two types of TEM inversion methods: linear inversion and nonlinear inversion methods. Nonlinear inversion methods, such as genetic algorithm [20], simulated annealing algorithm [21], particle swarm optimization [22], and others, start with a random model. The nonlinear inversion method reduces the dependence of the initial model when compared to linear inversion methods such as least square, but the model update is stochastic and requires a lot of forwarding simulation and inversion calculation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%