2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra13787c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle adsorption on a polyether sulfone membrane: how electrostatic interactions dominate membrane fouling

Abstract: This study presents a new method focussing on electrostatic interactions during fouling of microfiltration membranes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the interaction between protein and membrane is quite complex, with contributions stemming from charge distribution, molecular flexibility, chirality and geometrical unfolding of the protein macromolecule 21‐24 . Moreover, the physiochemical condition of the feed can significantly affect protein‐membrane interactions, 17,20,25‐27 including electrostatic interactions, 17,28 hydrophobic interactions 25‐27 and hydration forces 19,29 . Breite et al found that, unlike the model polystyrene foulant, fouling induced by bovine serum albumin (BSA) and lysozyme on zwitterionic polyethersulfone (PES) membranes cannot be explained by either electrostatic or hydrophobic interactions 25 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the interaction between protein and membrane is quite complex, with contributions stemming from charge distribution, molecular flexibility, chirality and geometrical unfolding of the protein macromolecule 21‐24 . Moreover, the physiochemical condition of the feed can significantly affect protein‐membrane interactions, 17,20,25‐27 including electrostatic interactions, 17,28 hydrophobic interactions 25‐27 and hydration forces 19,29 . Breite et al found that, unlike the model polystyrene foulant, fouling induced by bovine serum albumin (BSA) and lysozyme on zwitterionic polyethersulfone (PES) membranes cannot be explained by either electrostatic or hydrophobic interactions 25 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 For example, the size, 5 hydrophilicity, 6 and electrical properties 7 of the foulants have a critical impact on membrane fouling. In addition, the surface structure, 8 chemical properties, 9 hydrophilicity, 10,11 and charge 12,13 of the membranes also affect the fouling of the membranes. What's more, it is worth mentioning that ions in the solution play a crucial role in the membrane fouling process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies also revealed that electrostatic interactions dominate the fouling tendencies of polymer membranes [7,8,9]. If membrane and foulants are oppositely charged electrostatic attraction will occur leading to adsorption of the foulant and consequently to heavy membrane fouling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%