Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Participation in payments for ecosystem services: Case studies from the Lacandon rainforest, Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
121
0
24

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
121
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it is possible that a low payment is augmented by other non-monetary benefits; i.e. community organization and improved relations with management authorities, as has been seen in other PES projects (Kosoy et al, 2008;Wunder & Alban, 2008) and to which our data lend limited support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Finally, it is possible that a low payment is augmented by other non-monetary benefits; i.e. community organization and improved relations with management authorities, as has been seen in other PES projects (Kosoy et al, 2008;Wunder & Alban, 2008) and to which our data lend limited support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Household Income as a proxy of knowledge and experience was concluded as a significant determinant of PES participation though dependent on specific income level and program contexts [29,40]. Land, as the principal productive asset for rural households, has been commonly identified as a determinant of participation [66,67]. Also, Location variable indicates whether the willingness to participate in different provinces reflects consistently the differences in interest between upstream and downstream stakeholders within the MRC [46].…”
Section: Proportion Of Off-farm Employmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Land Area Land size is thought to be positively correlated with program participation, because rural households with more land are more likely to contract-out some of their lands while not jeopardizing their income-generating potential [64,66]. However, the statistical insignificant results for Land Area variable may be caused by two reasons.…”
Section: • Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, constant pressures Responding to disturbances: lessons from a Mayan social-ecological system 833 for high-yield productive activities are leading to social-ecological vulnerability while diminishing sustainable practices for managing resources (Ayala 2001;Martínez-Ballesté et al 2006). Finally, public conservation policies, like payment for environmental services (PES) or protected areas (PA), are being questioned about their real capacity for maintaining long-term effects on forest conservation (Ellis and Porter-Bolland 2008;Kosoy et al 2008). Nevertheless, some Mayan communities in the region have responded to these challenges relying on cultural values and not only on improvised responses, making relevant the understanding of the social-ecological systems they conform (Gómez-Pompa and Kaus 1999; Smardon and Faust 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%