2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

17
974
0
76

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,421 publications
(1,271 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
17
974
0
76
Order By: Relevance
“…As Table 4 shows, the total effect of the EP on the MPP is much greater than the direct effect and it is also significant (β = 0.332; p < 0.001), which might, according to Sarstedt et al [94], indicate the existence of a mediating effect of the competitive advantages on the relationship between both variables. In order to corroborate this mediation hypothesis, the total indirect effect must be significant and fulfill three requirements [73]: firstly, the direct effect between the EP and the MPP must be significant when the mediating variable is excluded from the model (β = 0.328; p < 0.001) (see Figure 2); secondly, the indirect effect via the mediating variable must be included in the model as in the case of CAD (β = 155; p < 0.001) and not like CAC (since β = −0.003 is not significant); and, thirdly, the size of the indirect effect on the total must exceed 20%.…”
Section: Structural Modelmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As Table 4 shows, the total effect of the EP on the MPP is much greater than the direct effect and it is also significant (β = 0.332; p < 0.001), which might, according to Sarstedt et al [94], indicate the existence of a mediating effect of the competitive advantages on the relationship between both variables. In order to corroborate this mediation hypothesis, the total indirect effect must be significant and fulfill three requirements [73]: firstly, the direct effect between the EP and the MPP must be significant when the mediating variable is excluded from the model (β = 0.328; p < 0.001) (see Figure 2); secondly, the indirect effect via the mediating variable must be included in the model as in the case of CAD (β = 155; p < 0.001) and not like CAC (since β = −0.003 is not significant); and, thirdly, the size of the indirect effect on the total must exceed 20%.…”
Section: Structural Modelmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Finally, in terms of the mediation of competitive advantages in the relationship between the EP and the FP, the total effect is lower than the direct effect (see Table 4) and so we can declare that no mediating effect occurs either via the CAD nor via the CAC [94]. Figure 2 summarizes the final estimated model.…”
Section: Structural Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The total effect is obtained with the following formula: Total effect = Direct effect + Indirect effect (Sarstedt, Ringle, Smith, Reams, & Hair, 2014).…”
Section: Figure 2: Hypothesis Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Um modelo é a representação de uma teoria, assim, para se desenvolver a aplicação da técnica de modelagem de equações estruturais, o pesquisador partiu de uma base teórica para se estabelecer o modelo de pesquisa e testar as hipóteses desenvolvidas, como apresentado no (SARSTEDT et al, 2014).…”
Section: Modelo De Equações Estruturaisunclassified
“…Para o modelo proposto, o valor obtido foi de 0,433, sendo que a referência para essa medida é valor acima de zero, assim a acurácia preditiva do modelo é considerada aceitável (SARSTEDT et al, 2014).…”
Section: Modelo De Equações Estruturaisunclassified