1982
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parent Reinforcement for Child Achievement: The Use of a Lottery to Maximize Parent Training Effects

Abstract: This study describes and evaluates a reinforcement program in which parents earned lottery tickets and won prizes for the progress made by their handicapped children during home-based intervention. An ABAB reversal design replicated across three families was used to assess the effects of the lottery on the children's mastery of language skills. Results showed that the reinforcement of the parents for training accomplishments, as indexed by their children's achievements, produced clinically significant increase… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Caregivers might be reluctant to adhere to the treatment when improvement is not immediate (Allen & Warzak, 2000). Additional follow-up visits and parental incentives for improvement in child behavior (Muir & Milan, 1982) may be necessary to ensure that treatment implementation is maintained. Conversely, problem behavior did not occur during a number of the training sessions with Sam's caregivers, limiting opportunities for the caregivers to implement the procedure and to receive appropriate feedback.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caregivers might be reluctant to adhere to the treatment when improvement is not immediate (Allen & Warzak, 2000). Additional follow-up visits and parental incentives for improvement in child behavior (Muir & Milan, 1982) may be necessary to ensure that treatment implementation is maintained. Conversely, problem behavior did not occur during a number of the training sessions with Sam's caregivers, limiting opportunities for the caregivers to implement the procedure and to receive appropriate feedback.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean levels during baseline and maintenance phases are indicated by horizontal dashed lines (Bea-home and group training site data combined; Rae-home data only). (Muir & Milan, 1982;Peterson et al, 1983;Szykula et al, 1981), using desired items that are available to most service agencies (e.g., donated gift certificates, toys, and dothes), contingent on maintaining performance during follow-up, may be an effective maintenance strategy. It is also possible that maintenance may have been greater if more training sessions had been provided, as research in "overtraining" (Sutherland & Mackintosh, 1971) suggests broadened attention and learning when training is continued beyond mastery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of the intervention components examined in this study has been shown to be effective across a variety of populations, settings, and target behaviors (e.g., Drabman & Spitalnik, 1973;King, Lange, & Errikson, 1982;Muir & Milan, 1982;Pinkston, Howe, & Blackman, 1986-1987Schilling & Cuvo, 1983). Contrary to previous findings, the lottery and serving as a confederate role model had no effect on the healthy choices of the 3 participants, perhaps because of the initial impact of enhanced prompts, feedback, and social reinforcement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%