2004
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200310045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric and Nonparametric Analyses of Repeated Ordinal Categorical Data

Abstract: SummaryWe compare two models for the analysis of repeated ordinal categorical data: the classical parametric model for means of scores assigned to the categories of the response variable and a nonparametric model based on relative effects derived from the marginal distribution functions of the response. An example in the field of Dentistry is used to illustrate and to compare the models. We also consider a simulation study to evaluate the type-I error rates and the power of tests under both models in a balance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the field of epidemiology, Kahler, Rogausch, Brunner, and Himmel (2008) observed that even though many measures of healthrelated quality of life aspects are ordinal, the data are typically analyzed using parametric tests. These authors examined whether applying parametric tests (instead of the appropriate nonparametric tests) to these quality of life data could affect the results and found that using parametric tests to analyze ordinal data could lead to erroneous results (see also Norris, Ghali, Saunders, Brant, & Galbraith, 2004;Singer, Poleto, & Rosa, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of epidemiology, Kahler, Rogausch, Brunner, and Himmel (2008) observed that even though many measures of healthrelated quality of life aspects are ordinal, the data are typically analyzed using parametric tests. These authors examined whether applying parametric tests (instead of the appropriate nonparametric tests) to these quality of life data could affect the results and found that using parametric tests to analyze ordinal data could lead to erroneous results (see also Norris, Ghali, Saunders, Brant, & Galbraith, 2004;Singer, Poleto, & Rosa, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonparametric analyses of repeated ordinal categorical data were performed to verify the relationship between PROP taster status and pleasantness (SINGER; POLETO;ROSA, 2004). A value of p < 0.05 was used as criterion for statistical significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the performance of this complex approach is highly sensitive to the choice of model for mean function and correlation structure for errors (Littell, Pendergast, & Natarajan, 2000;Park, Park, & Davis, 2001;Vossoughi, Ayatollahi, Towhidi, & Ketabchi, 2012). Although several nonparametric methods have been developed for non-normal responses (Azzalini & Bowman, 1991;Singer, Poleto, & Rosa, 2004;Wernecke & Kalb, 1999;Wernecke & Kaufmann, 2000), model building and software implementation of these methods are extremely complicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the MANOVA tests perform poorly when the distribution of errors much deviates from multivariate normal (Davis, 1980(Davis, , 1982Everitt, 1979;Olson, 1974;Um & Randles, 1998). Bhapkar (1984) and Sen (1984) discussed asymptotically distribution-free analogous of profile analysis. Multivariate extensions of Kruskal-Wallis and Brown-Mood median tests based on marginal ranks and signs were discussed in Puri and Sen (1971) but suffer from a lack of invariance with respect to affine transformations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%