2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameters and contact models for DEM simulations of agricultural granular materials: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
104
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
3
104
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…To select the range of the experimental design (central composite design) for the studied parameters, we have used a wider range found in the literature [3,8,9,17,21,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] for DEM simulations of agricultural materials. However, it is still important to highlight that the calibration methodology used in this work allowed us, besides to identify appropriate values of these parameters, also to quantify their effects, as well as the interaction between them on the repose angle of these materials (as monoparticles and binary mixtures).…”
Section: 2 Simulations Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To select the range of the experimental design (central composite design) for the studied parameters, we have used a wider range found in the literature [3,8,9,17,21,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] for DEM simulations of agricultural materials. However, it is still important to highlight that the calibration methodology used in this work allowed us, besides to identify appropriate values of these parameters, also to quantify their effects, as well as the interaction between them on the repose angle of these materials (as monoparticles and binary mixtures).…”
Section: 2 Simulations Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is possible to compare the best range for each parameter found in the present work for acerola seeds with the values obtained with other agricultural materials. For example, shear modulus:3.7 x10 6 for rapeseed [33], 10 x10 6 for corn seeds [24]; coefficient of restitution: 0.6 for rapeseed [25], 0.56 for pea [26], 0.5 for rice [27]; coefficient of static friction: 0.65 [27] and 0.64 [28] for rice, 0.8 for chickpea [28], 0.52 for pea [29], 0.54 for barley [29], 0.59 for rapeseed [29], 0.62 for maize [29]; coefficient of rolling friction: 0.3 for rice [27] To illustrate the results of the present work, Figure 2 shows the experimental image (a) and two simulations: one with a good agreement with experimental data (run 16) (b) and another with high deviation (run 21) (c). …”
Section: Acerola Residuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The input parameters for the DEM are mechanical-physical properties, which best describe a specific particulate material. Typically, these include grain size, material density, friction between particles and contact geometry [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%