Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Abstract A novel dynamic asset-allocation approach is proposed where portfolios as well as portfolio strategies are updated at every decision period based on their past performance. For modeling, a general class of models is specified that combines a dynamic factor and a vector autoregressive model and includes stochastic volatility, denoted by FAVAR-SV. It is an extended version of a factor-augmented vector autoregressive model, Bernanke et al. (2005). Next, a Bayesian strategy combination is introduced in order to deal with a set of strategies. Our approach extends the mixture of the experts analysis (Jacobs et al., 1991, Jordan and Jacobs, 1994, Jordan and Xu, 1995, Peng et al., 1996, by allowing the strategic weights to be dependent between strategies as well as over time and to further allow for strategy incompleteness. Our approach results in a combination of different portfolio strategies: a model-based and a residual momentum strategy, see Blitz et al. (2011). The estimation of this modeling and strategy approach can be done using an extended and modified version of the forecast combination methodology of Casarin et al. (2016). In the approach use is made of an implied state space structure for model and strategy weights. Given the complexity of the non-linear and non-Gaussian structure a new and efficient filter is introduced based on the MitISEM approach, see Hoogerheide et al. (2012). Using US industry portfolios between 1926M7 and 2015M6 as data, our empirical results indicate that time-varying combinations of flexible models in the FAVAR-SV class and two momentum strategies lead to better return and risk features than very simple and very complex models. More specifically, the proposed model combinations help 1 to improve return features like mean returns and Sharpe ratios while combinations of two strategies help to reduce risk features like volatility and largest loss. The latter result indicates that complete densities provide useful information for risk.
Terms of use:
Documents in