On the Rise of Bayesian Econometrics after Cowles Foundation Monographs 10, 14

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Abstract This paper starts with a brief description of the introduction of the likelihood approach in econometrics as presented in Cowles Foundation Monographs 10 and 14. A sketch is given of the criticisms on this approach mainly from the first group of Bayesian econometricians. Publication and citation patterns of Bayesian econometric papers are analyzed in ten major econometric journals from the late 1970s until the first few months of 2014. Results indicate a cluster of journals with theoretical and applied papers, mainly consisting of Journal of Econometrics, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics and Journal of Applied Econometrics which contains the large majority of high quality Bayesian econometric papers. A second cluster of theoretical journals, mainly consisting of Econometrica and Review of Economic Studies contains few Bayesian econometric papers. The scientific impact, however, of these few papers on Bayesian econometric research is substantial. Special issues from the journals Econometric Reviews, Journal of Econometrics and Econometric Theory received wide attention. Marketing Science shows an ever increasing number of Bayesian papers since the middle nineties. The International Economic Review and the Review of Economics and Statistics show a moderate time varying increase. An upward movement in publication patterns in most journals occurs in the early 1990s due to the effect of the 'Computational Revolution'. The paper continues using a visualization technique to connect papers and authors around important empirical subjects such as forecasting in macro models and finance, choice and and equilibrium in micro models and marketing, and around more methodological subjects as model uncertainty and sampling algorithms. The information distilled from this analysis shows names of authors who contribute substantially to particular subjects. Next, subjects are discussed where Bayesian econometrics has shown substantial advances, namely, implementing stochastic simulation methods due to the computational revolution; flexible and unobserved component model structures in macroeconomic and finance; hierarchical structures and choice models in microeconomics and marketing. Three issues are summarized where Bayesian and frequentist econometricians differ: Identification, the value of prior information and model evaluation; dynamic inference and nonstationarity; vector autoregressive versus structural modeling. A topic of debate amongst Bayesian e...

Bayesian Analysis of Boundary and Near-Boundary Evidence in Econometric Models with Reduced Rank

“…The Bayesian approach is eminently suitable for this. We take the viewpoint that the scientific evidence should be reported in such a way that the information specified in the likelihood dominates with respect to other sources of information, see Baştürk et al (2014a) for a historical background. Thus our approach to specifying prior information is one where relatively weak information is used compared to that of the likelihood.…”

“…Remark 2 : The development of efficient computational procedures using simulationbased methods has been essential and an active area of research in Bayesian econometrics but it is a topic beyond the scope of this paper. For a historical analysis of the development of this topic since the early nineteen-seventies we refer to Baştürk et al (2014a). Modern hardware and software including parallel computation allow detailed analysis of many of the issues listed in this paper.…”

Parallelization Experience with Four Canonical Econometric Models Using ParMitISEM

“…Berger (1985), Hoogerheide et al (2007b) and De Pooter et al (2008). The phenomenon of multi-modal, skewed shapes and/or ridges in the surface of posteriors and predictive densities, occurs frequently in empirical econometric analysis, see Baştürk et al (2014a) for a review. In such cases it is not trivial to perform inference on the joint posterior distribution of parameters using basic Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, which may be inefficient and inaccurate due to the non-standard conditional densities.…”

The Place of the History of Economic Thought in Mainstream Economics, 1991–2011, Viewed Through a Bibliographic Survey

“… 48 In our view, Gingras and Schinckus (2012); Basturk et al (2014); Fourcade, Ollion, and Algan (2015); Panhans and Singleton (2015); and Claveau and Gingras (forthcoming) offer stimulating instances of new ways in which sociologists and historians of economists can engage with the larger community of economists. …”