Para além da paz liberal? respostas ao "retrocesso"

Richmond, Oliver P.

doi:10.1590/s0102-85292010000200002

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Tal concepción del triple bottom line se incrementa actualmente en la Agenda 2030 -y cuyos ODS son vistos como gobernanza global en una estandarización de soft law-por otros dos pilares, según lo informado por Caldas (2016): la paz, entendido como "paz-como-gobernanza" (Richmond, 2010); y la asociación, mejor traducido por el significado de concertación. De esta manera, se amplía el llamado trípode de la sostenibilidad para basar el desarrollo en los cinco pilares: planet, people, profit, peace y partnership (ONU, 2015b).…”

Section: Entre Riesgos Y Excepciones Constitucionales: Definiciones Eunclassified

Gobernanza glocal/global deliberativa hacia la normativización democrática: la necesidad de legitimidad en compatibilización de las medidas pandémicas de excepción vs. derechos humanos

Teixeira

Caldas

2020

Opin. jurid.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La lucha contra la pandemia de la COVID-19 puso una serie de medidas de emergencia sobre la mesa de los Estados más afectados que, en nombre de la protección de la salud pública, plantean serias dudas sobre su compatibilidad con la protección universal de los derechos humanos. Al limitar absolutamente libertades individuales muy básicas, ciertas medidas restrictivas fueron interpretadas como reales excepciones constitucionales. Al tratar de enfrentar el problema de la incompatibilidad, desde el punto de vista de la legitimidad social de las medidas excepcionales pandémicas y la protección general de los derechos humanos, esta investigación buscará desarrollar aspectos relacionados con su normativización en ámbito mundial por medio de la noción de gobernanza glocal/global democrática y deliberativa. Esta noción se entiende, sobre todo, como un instrumento para la realización del constitucionalismo transnacional en creación de un “derecho común de cooperación” en términos häberlesianos. Metodológicamente, se utilizará un enfoque analítico-descriptivo de acuerdo con el método deductivo y con la ayuda de referencias bibliográficas y documentales cuando se aborden las nociones de estado de excepción vs. derechos humanos, riesgos y gobernanza en el contexto de la actual globalización. De este modo, la hipótesis central se desarrollará mediante la articulación de tales categorías conceptuales dentro de un marco transnacional teórico-constitucional y de derechos humanos. En este sentido, el objetivo es trazar las características generales de estandarización de esta gobernanza glocal/global deliberativa. Se concluye que hay necesidad de superar legítimamente, con los recursos dromocráticos de concertación junto con los ordenamientos jurídicos de cada Estado, los desafíos de la pandemia creados por la sociedad contemporánea del riesgo y de la información.

show abstract

Section: Entre Riesgos Y Excepciones Constitucionales: Definiciones Eunclassified

Gobernanza glocal/global deliberativa hacia la normativización democrática: la necesidad de legitimidad en compatibilización de las medidas pandémicas de excepción vs. derechos humanos

Teixeira

Caldas

2020

Opin. jurid.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to this author, the international donor community seeks to export Western liberal institutions to be deployed in conflict zones, creating an artificial and ineffective apparatus for local communities receiving aid. It is a concept of peace that translates better as governance for donor countries than as security for recipient countries (Richmond, 2010). This idea is also shared by Donais (2012) and Maschietto (2016), who have been working with the concept of local ownership, which is currently very common in the discourse of donors, especially when it comes to security sector reform.…”

Section: Foreign Aid and Security Sector Reformmentioning

confidence: 99%

International assistance and security sector reform in Latin America and Caribbean

Tomesani¹,

Carneiro²

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present work seeks to understand the security sector demands of Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), in the context of reforms promoted by international aid agencies in the region. The initial hypothesis of this study is that international aid programs focused on Security Sector Reform (SSR) in the region have been generic, and have overlooked recipient countries' own reform agendas. LAC perspectives on SSR have been inferred from documents of the Organization of American States (OAS), UNASUR, MERCOSUR, CARICOM and Andean Community documents. Information on international assistance for SSR programs was gathered from the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) database for the years 2004-2014. The analysis shows that assistance programs are not generic and that the profile of projects, resources allocated and countries targeted differ greatly according to donors. However, international offers do not account for the overall set of demands, and some of the more expensive programs funded by international assistance are not even mentioned in regional agendas, which suggests that SSR aid responds to funder"s guidelines rather than to local needs. The study also reveals differences between programs funded by bilateral and multilateral aid agencies in the region, showing that, in general, programs funded by multilateral agencies are more attentive to local demands than those promoted by bilateral agencies, which are less demand-driven and more guided by donor interests.

show abstract

Beyond Liberal Peacebuilding: A Critique of Liberal Peacebuilding and Exploring a Postmodern Post-liberal Hybrid Model of Peacebuilding

Tanabe¹

2017

IRD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the pressing problems with contemporary peacebuilding research is that much of the analysis focuses on the practical and technical challenges while paying little attention to the philosophical assumptions of those operations.Any understanding of peacebuilding is underpinned by philosophical frameworks as they shape and orient us towards particular strategies for peacebuilding. This paper makes a philosophical critique of liberal peacebuilding (the mainstream peacebuilding) and explores a postmodern post-liberal hybrid peacebuilding. The analysis claims neither the categorical rejection of liberal peacebuilding nor the exclusive reliance on locally-oriented peacebuilding. Rather, the upshot is the need for deconstructing dualistic view of either liberal peacebuilding or locally-oriented peacebuilding so that both external liberal actors and local actors engage in jointly learning and mutually transformative process wherein both liberal international actors and local actors look beyond peace constructed around their narrow and restricted conception and framework to create the meanings of peace that can interconnect the global and the local. IntroductionThis paper will make a philosophical critique of liberal peacebuilding and explore a postmodern post-liberal hybrid peacebuilding. One of the problems with contemporary peacebuilding research is that much of it has focused on the practical and technical challenges of peacebuilding whilst paying little attention to the philosophical assumptions of those technical operations (Paris, 2002). Truly, peace research is a practice-oriented intellectual enterprise that aims to transform a world filled with violence and contribute to achieving a more just and peaceful world (Rogers & Ramsbotham, 1999).However, any understanding of peace, conflict, and violence is underpinned by philosophical assumptions. Our philosophical frameworks shape and orient us towards particular strategies for conflict resolution and peacebuilding. Therefore, engagement in reflection on philosophical assumptions we normally employ in an unreflective use can offer us an opportunity to make an in-depth analysis of how those committed to peacebuilding construct their approaches to the enterprise. Philosophical analysis will help us create new ways to look at peacebuilding and broaden our understanding of the enterprise (Thompson, 2000). This does not mean to deny liberal peacebuilding. Rather, critique of philosophical framework of liberal peacebuilding and Juichiro Tanabe, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Graduate School of Social and Cultural Sciences, Kumamoto University. The first section introduces the basic ideas of peacebuilding, presenting the origin of peacebuilding and its core ideas. The second section critically examines liberal peacebuilding that has predominated the contemporary peacebuilding enterprise. Here, approaches of liberal peacebuilding and its philosophical underpinning will be critiqued. The third section will explore how postmodernism will contribute to post-liberal hybrid p...

show abstract

Para além da paz liberal? respostas ao "retrocesso"

Cited by 4 publications

References 6 publications

Gobernanza glocal/global deliberativa hacia la normativización democrática: la necesidad de legitimidad en compatibilización de las medidas pandémicas de excepción vs. derechos humanos

Gobernanza glocal/global deliberativa hacia la normativización democrática: la necesidad de legitimidad en compatibilización de las medidas pandémicas de excepción vs. derechos humanos

International assistance and security sector reform in Latin America and Caribbean

Beyond Liberal Peacebuilding: A Critique of Liberal Peacebuilding and Exploring a Postmodern Post-liberal Hybrid Model of Peacebuilding

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About