2016
DOI: 10.11649/slh.2015.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pamięć przyswojona. Koncepcja polskiego doświadczenia zagłady Żydów jako traumy zbiorowej w świetle rewizji kategorii świadka

Abstract: Abstrakt:Artykuł przedstawia rekonstrukcję i proponuje dekonstrukcję koncepcji polskiego doświadczenia Zagłady jako traumy zbiorowej. Kontekst analityczny stanowi rewizja takich kategorii, jak: polski świadek Zagłady (bystander/onlooker -za Hilbergiem) i obojętność wobec Zagłady. Tekst postuluje wykreślenie kategorii obojętności ze słownika opisu Zagłady. Kategorię świadka (bystander/onlooker) proponuje zastąpić kategorią obserwatora uczestniczącego w rozumieniu innym niż przyjęte w antropologii kulturowej. Sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, the concept of the witness is also increasingly criticized as being inadequate and not fairly describing the actual position of Poles and other Eastern Europeans towards The Shoah. Concerning that dispute, Janicka (2015) postulates that we should reject bystanders or onlookers who are passive, uninvolved objects and consider Poles a more active subject in the Holocaust.…”
Section: On the Moral Ambiguity Of Bystander Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, the concept of the witness is also increasingly criticized as being inadequate and not fairly describing the actual position of Poles and other Eastern Europeans towards The Shoah. Concerning that dispute, Janicka (2015) postulates that we should reject bystanders or onlookers who are passive, uninvolved objects and consider Poles a more active subject in the Holocaust.…”
Section: On the Moral Ambiguity Of Bystander Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in most Holocaust-related literature, scholars emphasize the active behavior of Poles (such as helping, collaborating, and robberies), we suggest that emotions (and hence their lay representations) were equally important. Poles and Jews shared a symbolic space in which they exchanged verbal and nonverbal messages which were as constitutive to the larger situation as overt moral or immoral behaviors (Janicka, 2015). This way of measuring lay representations also allows us to judge the extent to which they are skewed towards moral behaviors or reflect the moral heterogeneity of the Polish population during the Holocaust.…”
Section: On the Moral Ambiguity Of Bystander Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41. The cited reviews are from, respectively, Jarosław Komorowski, Teatr, March 1, 2000; Jacek Wierzbicki, Gazeta Wyborcza, October 6, 2000;and Elżbieta Czerwińska, Tygodnik Powszechny, November 28, 1999. All three reviews reappear at and are quoted from the entry for "Dybuk," Teatr Telewizji production, premiered November 22, 1999, Encyklopedia teatru polskiego, accessed December 15, 2022, http://encyklopediateatru.pl/przedstawienie/11166/dybuk 42.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She emphasized the importance of ‘watching and observing’:Thus, watching would be a form of activity, a way of having an influence on the events, of agency, and therefore a participation. (Janicka, 2015: 1)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%