2019
DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000001357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Palonosetron is a Better Choice Compared With Ondansetron for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV) in a Resource-limited Pediatric Oncology Center: Results From a Randomized Control Trial

Abstract: Palonosetron (PG) is a newer, safe, and effective long-acting 5-HT3 antagonist commonly used in adults, but data in children are limited. A randomized controlled trial was carried out among children with cancer during their first cycle of moderate or highly emetogenic chemotherapy to receive either PG or ondansetron (OG) with the aim of comparing their efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness. In total, 200 children (mean age, 8 y, male:female=1.8:1) were recruited, 100 in each arm. Complete response, defined … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The doses of the antiemetic used in the study were as per the standard recommendations and available studies published from India. 4 5 6 7 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The doses of the antiemetic used in the study were as per the standard recommendations and available studies published from India. 4 5 6 7 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The doses of the antiemetic used in the study were as per the standard recommendations and available studies published from India. [4][5][6][7] All participants receiving HEC regimen received a 5HT3 (5-hydroxytryptamine) receptor antagonist (0.25-mg palonosetron intravenously or 1-mg granisetron intravenously, with the specific agent chosen by the primary clinician) on day 1 of chemotherapy, dexamethasone (8-12 mg intravenously on day 1 and 8-mg orally on days 2, 3, and 4), an NK1 (neurokinnin 1) receptor antagonist (125-mg aprepitant orally on day 1 and 80 mg on days 2 and 3, or 150mg fosaprepitant intravenously on day 1), and olanzapine (10 mg per day orally from day 1-4) in the selected cohort.…”
Section: Treatment Regimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed characteristics of the included SR 21 (Table 2), primary clinical studies (RCTs) [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] (Table 3), economic studies [36][37][38][39][40] (Table 4), and guidelines [41][42][43][44][45][46][47] (Table 5) are provided in Appendix 2.…”
Section: Summary Of Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В мире зарегистрировано для клинического применения 5 препаратов из этой группы -ондансетрон, трописетрон, гранисетрон, доласетрон и палоносетрон, однако, как показали индивидуальные клинические исследования (некоторые частично или полностью состоящие из пациентов детского возраста) и их систематический анализ, в рекомендованных дозах все эти препараты имеют сопоставимые эффективность и безопасность [18]. Возможно, наиболее длительно действующий представитель классапалоносетрон имеет определенные преимущества при проведении многодневной химиотерапии или невозможности использовать кортикостероиды и/или NK-1-антагонисты [19][20][21], однако в большинстве случаев они не являются решающими при выборе 5-НТ3-антагониста в педиатрической практике. Современные педиатрические рекомендации перечисляют этот препарат наравне с другими 5-НТ3-антагонистами, не отдавая предпочтения, за исключением ситуаций, когда для профилактики ТИР, обусловленной высоко-или среднеэметогенной терапией, не могут быть использованы ни кортикостероиды, ни NK-1-антагонисты.…”
Section: антагонисты серотониновых рецепторов 3-го типаunclassified