2013
DOI: 10.4141/cjas2012-147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Packing plant differences in meat quality for grain-fed veal

Abstract: Campbell, C. P., Haley, J., Swanson, K. C. and Mandell, I. B. 2013. Packing plant differences in meat quality for grain-fed veal. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 93: 205–215. Packing plant differences in meat quality were investigated in grain-fed veal from three commercial packing plants and a university research facility. Postmortem chilling rates were investigated in three plants including facilities which encased carcass sides in a polyliner bag intended to reduce shrinkage during chilling. Packing plant differences (P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Use of a plastic polyliner to cover the carcass during chilling either was ineffective (P 0.13) for altering shear force with LM or actually increased (P B0.04) shear force for semitendinosus and semimembranosus muscles. Recent work in our laboratory has shown no improvement in shear force when grainfed veal carcasses were shrouded with a plastic polyliner during chilling (Campbell et al 2013). The major benefit of the plastic polyliner in the veal work was to decrease carcass shrink, which was not evaluated in the present study.…”
Section: Tenderness and Cooking Lossescontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Use of a plastic polyliner to cover the carcass during chilling either was ineffective (P 0.13) for altering shear force with LM or actually increased (P B0.04) shear force for semitendinosus and semimembranosus muscles. Recent work in our laboratory has shown no improvement in shear force when grainfed veal carcasses were shrouded with a plastic polyliner during chilling (Campbell et al 2013). The major benefit of the plastic polyliner in the veal work was to decrease carcass shrink, which was not evaluated in the present study.…”
Section: Tenderness and Cooking Lossescontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Greater (P B0.03) L* values for beef from red cloverÁ timothy versus tall fescue silage-fed cattle (Table 5) across the three muscles are of questionable biological significance (Campbell et al 2013). On the basis of L* values, forage-silage-finished beef LM in the present study was darker than grass silage beef LM observed by Warren et al (2008), where L* values were similar for concentrate-and grass-silage-finished beef.…”
Section: Meat Quality Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Slightly higher results (1.38%) reported Skřivanová et al (2007) in Holstein male calves fed with TMR. In contrast, Campbell et al (2013)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%