2007
DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2007.417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

P2G-4 Suppression of Acoustic Energy Leakage in FBARs with Al Bottom Electrode: FEM Simulation and Experimental Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was observed in the past that the dominant loss mechanism near the antiresonance frequency is acoustic propagation of power away from the resonator area (active area) to peripheral areas (passive area). 1,3,4) To the best of the authors' knowledge, no quantitative discussion has been made on this loss mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was observed in the past that the dominant loss mechanism near the antiresonance frequency is acoustic propagation of power away from the resonator area (active area) to peripheral areas (passive area). 1,3,4) To the best of the authors' knowledge, no quantitative discussion has been made on this loss mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…armonic and modal analysis by the finite element method (FEM) can be used for an accurate simulation of acoustic wave resonators, such as film bulk acoustic resonators (FBARs) and contour mode resonators. [1][2][3][4][5] It is possible to predict eigenmodes and the electrical device response, and it is even possible to analyze energy leakage paths. 6) However, for the parametric analysis and design of the entire real resonator device possibilities are limited, owing to the fact that FEM model complexity and the number of degrees of freedom (DOF) increase markedly and soon reach both the limit of available calculation resources and license limitations of commercial FEM software.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%