2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxytocin response in a trust game and habituation of arousal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
49
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results are shown (Table 1) of an analysis of the within-subject difference in cardiovascular measures averaged (quasi-integrated) across two higher arousal conditions compared to those averaged (quasi-integrated) across two lower arousal conditions detected in each of these two sessions by the similar direction of RP changes during each session as a measure of difference in a general cardiovascular arousal between conditions. In accordance with these preliminary findings, our methodological conceptualisation 3 and previous research (Freeman et al, 2011;Kéri and Kiss, 2011;York et al, 2007;Uchino et al, 1999Uchino et al, , 2005Treiber et al, 2003) the four BP and HR measurements from the two (interview-and posture-related) sessions were crossaveraged within each subject and assigned to two groups according to the pre-conditioned stressfulness of the situations: either (i) to evoke higher sympathetic arousal, confirmed by higher RP (the cardiovascular reading in the standing posture [physical challenge] and the reading before interview [psychological challenge]) or (ii) to induce lower sympathetic arousal, confirmed by lower RP (readings in the lying posture and after interview). This within-subject averaging across two different low arousal conditions and across two different high arousal conditions was assumed to better represent a general 'reactivity' or general 'stress tolerance' phenotype (York et al, 2007;Ottaviani et al, 2008;Davydov et al, 2010b).…”
Section: Cardiovascular Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Results are shown (Table 1) of an analysis of the within-subject difference in cardiovascular measures averaged (quasi-integrated) across two higher arousal conditions compared to those averaged (quasi-integrated) across two lower arousal conditions detected in each of these two sessions by the similar direction of RP changes during each session as a measure of difference in a general cardiovascular arousal between conditions. In accordance with these preliminary findings, our methodological conceptualisation 3 and previous research (Freeman et al, 2011;Kéri and Kiss, 2011;York et al, 2007;Uchino et al, 1999Uchino et al, , 2005Treiber et al, 2003) the four BP and HR measurements from the two (interview-and posture-related) sessions were crossaveraged within each subject and assigned to two groups according to the pre-conditioned stressfulness of the situations: either (i) to evoke higher sympathetic arousal, confirmed by higher RP (the cardiovascular reading in the standing posture [physical challenge] and the reading before interview [psychological challenge]) or (ii) to induce lower sympathetic arousal, confirmed by lower RP (readings in the lying posture and after interview). This within-subject averaging across two different low arousal conditions and across two different high arousal conditions was assumed to better represent a general 'reactivity' or general 'stress tolerance' phenotype (York et al, 2007;Ottaviani et al, 2008;Davydov et al, 2010b).…”
Section: Cardiovascular Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In those designs all participants inhaled a product whose nature was unknown to them: half of them (the control) inhaled an innocuous substance and the other half (the treatment) inhaled a dose of oxytocin. The results indicate that there is a significant difference between the transfers of the two groups, being higher in the treatment (Baumgartner et al, 2008;Fehr et al, 2005;Kéri and Kiss, 2011;Kosfeld et al, 2005;Van Ijzendoorn and Bakermans-Kranenburg, 2012). Now let's say that the same subject 2 who decided to transfer 50% of his money in the classic game (equivalent to the control condition in the oxytocin experiment) decides to transfer 70% to his opponent when subjected to the inhalation of the hormone.…”
Section: How We Make Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Oxytocin has been implicated in other mechanisms of arousal [63,64]. The decrease in lung atelectasis during yawning further prepares a yawning subject to take "fight-or-flight" action.…”
Section: Arousal Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%