1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00422540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oxidation of short-chain fatty acids by sulfate-reducing bacteria in freshwater and in marine sediments

Abstract: Colony counts of acetate-, propionate- and L-lactate-oxidizing sulfate-reducing bacteria in marine sediments were made. The vertical distribution of these organisms were equal for the three types considered. The highest numbers were found just beneath the border of aerobic and anaerobic layers. Anaerobic mineralization of acetate, propionate and L-lactate was studied in the presence and in the absence of sulfate. In freshwater and in marine sediments, acetate and propionate were oxidized completely with concom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
107
2
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
10
107
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…data). The metabolism of these fermentation products by sulfate-reducers has also been documented in the sulfate-reducing zone of marine sediments (S0-RENSEN et aI., 1981;LAANBROEK and PFENNIG, 1981;BALSA and NEDWELL, 1982;CHRISTENSEN, 1984;WINFREY and WARD, 1983;BANA T and NEDWELL, 1983;BANA T et aI., 1983;OREMLAND and TAYWR, 1978;ABRAM and NEDWELL, 1978). Although lactate is sometimes considered to be an important substrate for sulfate reducers, measurements of the rate of lactate production in sediments and other anaerobic ecosystems indicate that the fermentation of organic matter to lactate is minor when H2 is maintained at low partial pressures by methanogens or sulfate reducers and references therein).…”
Section: Model Of Organic Matter Diagenesismentioning
confidence: 88%
“…data). The metabolism of these fermentation products by sulfate-reducers has also been documented in the sulfate-reducing zone of marine sediments (S0-RENSEN et aI., 1981;LAANBROEK and PFENNIG, 1981;BALSA and NEDWELL, 1982;CHRISTENSEN, 1984;WINFREY and WARD, 1983;BANA T and NEDWELL, 1983;BANA T et aI., 1983;OREMLAND and TAYWR, 1978;ABRAM and NEDWELL, 1978). Although lactate is sometimes considered to be an important substrate for sulfate reducers, measurements of the rate of lactate production in sediments and other anaerobic ecosystems indicate that the fermentation of organic matter to lactate is minor when H2 is maintained at low partial pressures by methanogens or sulfate reducers and references therein).…”
Section: Model Of Organic Matter Diagenesismentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Enumerations of bacteria using MPN methods supplemented with specific substrates for SO|~-reducing groups have shown the presence of bacteria able to use many substrates including lactate, ethanol, acetate, malate, and propionate (Laanbroek and Pfennig, 1981). Lactate and acetate utilizers often outnumber other groups illustrating the importance of both incomplete and complete oxidizing SO 2 , reducers in sediments.…”
Section: Sulfate-reducing Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our choice of lactate, acetate, and succinate (plus ethanol for spore formers) as single electron donors enabled us to d~stinguish between the major categories to be expected (Laanbroek & Pfennig 1981, Widdel 1988. Also, if lactate in selective media is replaced by alternate electron donors, maximum abundances are still noted for lactate utilizers (Laanbroek & Pfennig 1981, Battersby et al 1985. Presumably, many of the Desulfovibrio spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…occurring in the partly oxidized environment ( Table 1) may indicate that oxygen tolerance of the spores is not the key for competitive advantage under unstable redox conditions. Survival and activity of SRB in oxidized marine sediments have been explained by anoxic microniches and trapplng of oxygen by the end product of sulfate reduction (Jsrgensen 1977, Laanbroek & Pfennig 1981, Battersby 1985. Furthermore, Desulfovibrio spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation