2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.intacc.2005.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ownership structure, contingent-fit, and business-unit performance: A research model and empirical evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…By using moderated regression analysis, Hartmann and Moers (1999) tested contingency hypotheses that predict interaction effects between budgetary and contextual variables. Building on fitness landscape theory, Jermias and Gani (2005) defined contingent-fit as the weighted sum of the independent contribution of each contextual variable to the chosen strategy. HassabElnaby et al 2005…”
Section: The Concept Of "Fit"mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…By using moderated regression analysis, Hartmann and Moers (1999) tested contingency hypotheses that predict interaction effects between budgetary and contextual variables. Building on fitness landscape theory, Jermias and Gani (2005) defined contingent-fit as the weighted sum of the independent contribution of each contextual variable to the chosen strategy. HassabElnaby et al 2005…”
Section: The Concept Of "Fit"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher the level of fit, the better the performance. Jermias and Gani (2005) considered "contingent fit" as one of the most appropriate approaches for examining the relationship between evolving system and performance. Organizational performance in this thesis is studied along two major dimensions, effectiveness and efficiency, as discussed in Section 3 of this chapter.…”
Section: Framework and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations