2013
DOI: 10.1503/jpn.120059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of potential procedural and participant- related confounds for neuroimaging of the resting state

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
71
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
0
71
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonsmokers (no more than 10 cigarettes consumed during their whole life) were studied to avoid confounding effects of withdrawal symptoms [20]. We recruited only male subjects to minimize gender-related bias [23] and possible hormonal interaction with nicotine [24]. All subjects gave written informed consent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonsmokers (no more than 10 cigarettes consumed during their whole life) were studied to avoid confounding effects of withdrawal symptoms [20]. We recruited only male subjects to minimize gender-related bias [23] and possible hormonal interaction with nicotine [24]. All subjects gave written informed consent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, functional connectivity may be observed even between regions that are not functionally interacting with each other due to effects of the experimental setup. A similar consideration also holds for structured noise or confounds, such as motion or physiological effects (Birn, 2012;Duncan & Northoff, 2013). If their influence is not removed from the data or accommodated in the analysis, spurious correlations will arise.…”
Section: Functional Connectivity: Definition and Conceptual Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All subjects were Caucasian and students at the University of Oldenburg. We decided to use only male subjects in order to minimize gender-related confounds [21] and possible hormonal interaction with nicotine [22]. All subjects gave their written informed consent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%