Mining Machines and Earth-Moving Equipment 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-25478-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of Materials Testing of Brown-Coal Mining Machines (Years 1985–2017)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, according to [ 8 ], steel with a nominal hardness of 650 HB showed the highest impact wear resistance, and it can thus be assumed that these properties remain satisfactory. The above conclusions were also confirmed in [ 9 ], where Hardox 500 steel plates applied to a bucket wheel chute showed no pronounced wear when compared to 18G2A steel (P355N) hardfaced with an Fe-Cr-C alloy. Moreover, this statement goes against the results of the tribological analysis performed using a T-07 device, which enables wear resistance in the presence of a loose abrasive to be tested.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, according to [ 8 ], steel with a nominal hardness of 650 HB showed the highest impact wear resistance, and it can thus be assumed that these properties remain satisfactory. The above conclusions were also confirmed in [ 9 ], where Hardox 500 steel plates applied to a bucket wheel chute showed no pronounced wear when compared to 18G2A steel (P355N) hardfaced with an Fe-Cr-C alloy. Moreover, this statement goes against the results of the tribological analysis performed using a T-07 device, which enables wear resistance in the presence of a loose abrasive to be tested.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Their coefficient of relative abrasion resistance k bAV with respect to C45 steel in the as-normalized condition is at the level of 1.25–1.29, and therefore the resistance of these steels can be considered to be very similar to each other. In comparison, according to [ 9 ], the values obtained are higher than the resistance of Brinar 500 and Hardox 500 (k bAV equal to 1.11 and 1.20, respectively). Moreover, the study did not show a linear relationship between the hardness of the material and the abrasive wear resistance, and such a relationship could not be shown for the grain size of the former austenite either.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this group of samples, one part of the material was tested in the post-operative state and the other after heat treatment (normalization) to simulate the initial state. The relevance of such analysis has been widely confirmed by the authors' works concerning destructive mechanical tests [3][4][5]7,9], following the assumption of degradation theory [3,11,12]. For corrosion and fracture toughness tests, samples from the hall of the Wrocław Main Railway Station were used, resembling the materials published in the work (taken from other beams) [4].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-alloy martensitic steels are the preferred materials for machining parts exposed to abrasive wear [ 1 , 2 ], utilizing their declared workability and weldability together with satisfactory hardness [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ]. Supported by Archard’s equation relating wear resistance with hardness, this view has become very popular in the community [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%