2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Over-politeness in Persian professional interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One plausible explanation for the distribution of comments in our data could be that the supervisor teachers were compelled to be over-polite to their colleagues. This finding seems to be congruent with that of Izadi (2016) who found that over-polite evaluations constitute professional discourses and Persian cultural practices at times could even conflate with professional practices due to over-politeness. As was the case in the present study, professional discourses are places where individuals face a conflict of professional roles and the wider societal roles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One plausible explanation for the distribution of comments in our data could be that the supervisor teachers were compelled to be over-polite to their colleagues. This finding seems to be congruent with that of Izadi (2016) who found that over-polite evaluations constitute professional discourses and Persian cultural practices at times could even conflate with professional practices due to over-politeness. As was the case in the present study, professional discourses are places where individuals face a conflict of professional roles and the wider societal roles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Following the orientation program, teacher-supervisors were assigned to observe four sessions of their different colleaguesí classes and provide constructive supervisory feedback (CSF) after each session. Afterwards, following Anderson and Radencich (2001), Bowman (2001), Glenn (2006), Izadi (2016), and Murdoch (2000), the teacher-supervisorsí written feedback reports and comments on the checklist were analyzed and categorized in terms of the proportions of compliments, criticisms, and suggestions based on the checklist. Moreover, their overall comments at the end of the checklist was further analyzed by the researchers, and further instances of value-laden comments concerning the three feedback moves were identified and added to their own lists in the checklist.…”
Section: Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This position agrees with the view of Valeika and Verikaite (2010) quoted in Laurinaityté (2011: p. 13) that politeness is a means of achieving some goals. In essence, the strategies used in our data are chiefly positive politeness strategies which "are usually employed to claim solidarity" (Scollon and Scollon quoted in Izadi (2013)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparatively under-researched notion of over-politeness can be defined as a type of behaviour which is evaluated as too polite for the context (Izadi, 2016). It is labelled as a negative aspect of interaction (Watts, 2003;Locher, 2004), akin to impoliteness, as both "exceed the boundary between appropriateness and inappropriateness" (Locher, 2004: 90).…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%