2009
DOI: 10.1257/aer.99.2.459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Over My Dead Body: Bargaining and the Price of Dignity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 g maximizes overall social welfare in (17), taking as given the groupsí reference utilities fR i 2 (b)g, and taking into account how the policy a §ects equilibrium participation in current riots. 13 We assume throughout the remainder of this section that the government objective function (17) is concave. This requires additional restrictions, besides concavity of V i t .…”
Section: The General Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 g maximizes overall social welfare in (17), taking as given the groupsí reference utilities fR i 2 (b)g, and taking into account how the policy a §ects equilibrium participation in current riots. 13 We assume throughout the remainder of this section that the government objective function (17) is concave. This requires additional restrictions, besides concavity of V i t .…”
Section: The General Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Åstebro et al () invoke Adam Smith's “presumptuous hope of success” (p. 57). This creates incentives to move from distorted beliefs to distorted actions that might increase well‐being, as hope about one's future may generate anticipatory utility; people like to think positively about themselves and the personal situations they might encounter (Bénabou & Tirole, ). Individuals may care “more about feeling smart than about reality” (Köszegi, , p. 673).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in the literature that incorporates unawareness, agents are assumed to be aware that they are unaware of something (Filiz-Ozbay, 2008;Ozbay, 2006;Heifetz et al, 2009;von Thadden and Zhao, 2009). In the cognitive thinking literature, agents know that there are some foreseeable events but cannot foresee these events without making this cognitive effort (Tirole, 2009). Similarly, the literature on willpower assumes that agents can blindly impose certain wrong beliefs while making decisions even though they fully understand that this belief is completely wrong and not justifiable (Benabou and Tirole, 2009).…”
Section: Public Quantal Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the cognitive thinking literature, agents know that there are some foreseeable events but cannot foresee these events without making this cognitive effort (Tirole, 2009). Similarly, the literature on willpower assumes that agents can blindly impose certain wrong beliefs while making decisions even though they fully understand that this belief is completely wrong and not justifiable (Benabou and Tirole, 2009). All of the aforementioned research streams allow for some sophistication despite the accommodation of behavioral issues and bounded rationality.…”
Section: Public Quantal Responsementioning
confidence: 99%