1999
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9701.00250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outward Orientation and Economic Development in Malaysia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structure of industry that evolved was still much in line with what one would have expected, given the nature of Malaysia's comparative advantage and changing factor endowments (Athukorala and Menon, 1999). Most of the industries set up under HICOM were "born losers" artificially spawned with subsidies.…”
Section: Phase Ii: the New Economic Policy Period 1970 To 1987mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The structure of industry that evolved was still much in line with what one would have expected, given the nature of Malaysia's comparative advantage and changing factor endowments (Athukorala and Menon, 1999). Most of the industries set up under HICOM were "born losers" artificially spawned with subsidies.…”
Section: Phase Ii: the New Economic Policy Period 1970 To 1987mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Total employment increased at an average rate of 3.6% per year during 1970-90, whereas population growth was only 2.6%. The share of manufacturing in total labor employment increased from 14% in the mid-1970s to over 26% in the mid-1990s (Athukorala & Menon, 2002). Malay employment benefitted from an expansion of the public sector (as shown in Table 1, its growth rate during 1970-90 was comparable to that of the other sectors).…”
Section: Economic Growth and Income Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Trade in labour intensive products, including both agriculture and manufacturing products, has the potential to create substantial employment opportunities for low skilled workers, precisely those living below or near the poverty line. A number of studies have come up with evidence in support of this mainstream prediction (Athukorala and Menon, 1999;Fields, 1980;Krueger et al, 1988: Fei et al, 1979Harrison, 2006;Manning, 1998).…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%