2000
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200003000-00031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osteoclastogenesis is Repressed by Mechanical Strain in an In Vitro Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that calcium oscillation could enhance the resorption ability of osteoclasts, 15 high FSS level might inhibit the functions of osteoclasts. Some studies showed that high mechanical stretching strain can inhibit the formation of osteoclasts, 8,14 but a cell-level experiment demonstrated that TRAP activity and the number and size of resorption pits increased with increasing FSS (6-20 dyne/cm 2 ) on osteoclasts. 11 Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the correlation among FSS levels, calcium response of osteoclasts, and bone resorption in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that calcium oscillation could enhance the resorption ability of osteoclasts, 15 high FSS level might inhibit the functions of osteoclasts. Some studies showed that high mechanical stretching strain can inhibit the formation of osteoclasts, 8,14 but a cell-level experiment demonstrated that TRAP activity and the number and size of resorption pits increased with increasing FSS (6-20 dyne/cm 2 ) on osteoclasts. 11 Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the correlation among FSS levels, calcium response of osteoclasts, and bone resorption in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al found that marrow stromal cells change their proliferation rate and gene expression patterns in response to mechanical stimulation (Li et al, 2004). With respect to osteoclast number: stromal cell expression of the osteoclastogenic facto, RANKL is sensitive to mechanical force (Rubin et al, 1999(Rubin et al, , 2002c, suggesting that the number of osteoclasts present is controlled through mechanical regulation sensed by stromal cells. However, the osteoclast itself has also been shown to respond to mechanical signals adding another layer of control by which mechanical force might limit bone resorption (Wiltink et al, 1995).…”
Section: Mechanosensitive Bone Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osteoclastogenesis has been shown to be regulated by mechanical loading both in vitro and in vivo (17,19,21,(40)(41)(42)(43). Rubin and colleagues (40)(41)(42)(43) have shown that dynamic mechanical strain can decrease osteoclast formation by about 50% in primary marrow cultures, and this is mediated through a decrease in RANKL and an increase in eNOS-generated NO in bone marrow stromal cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rubin and colleagues (40)(41)(42)(43) have shown that dynamic mechanical strain can decrease osteoclast formation by about 50% in primary marrow cultures, and this is mediated through a decrease in RANKL and an increase in eNOS-generated NO in bone marrow stromal cells. OPG expression at both the gene and the protein level has also been shown to be regulated by mechanical stimulation (21,45).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%