2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthotropic enriched element free Galerkin method for fracture analysis of composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, a subtriangles technique originated from XFEM and similar to the one proposed by Ghorashi et al for the element free Galerkin method (EFGM) is employed to overcome the reduction of accuracy of integration. As illustrated in Figure , when employing the subtriangles technique, elements intersected with a crack is subdivided at both sides into subtriangles whose edges are adjusted to the crack faces.…”
Section: Extended Isogeometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, a subtriangles technique originated from XFEM and similar to the one proposed by Ghorashi et al for the element free Galerkin method (EFGM) is employed to overcome the reduction of accuracy of integration. As illustrated in Figure , when employing the subtriangles technique, elements intersected with a crack is subdivided at both sides into subtriangles whose edges are adjusted to the crack faces.…”
Section: Extended Isogeometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subtriangles technique for partitioning the cracked elements : (a) crack edge and (b) crack tip.…”
Section: Extended Isogeometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely among them are Belytschko et al (2003), Sukumar and Prevost (2003), Bellec and Dolbow (2003), Sukumar et al (2005), Belytschko et al (2005), Asadpoure et al (2006a, b), Sladek et al (2006), Asadpoure and Mohammadi (2007), Belytschko and Gracie (2007), Tabarraei and Sukumar (2008), Giner et al (2009), Abdelaziz and Hamouine (2008), Ebrahimi et al (2008), Shibanuma and Utsunomiya (2009), Richardson et al (2009), Liang et al (2010), Hattori et al (2012), Mousavi and Sukumar (2010), Ghorashi et al (2011) and Chatzi et al (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Four types of finite elements are distinguished in these examples according to their positions with respect to the crack, the standard element contains 3×3 Gauss points. The element having tip enriched control points contains 7×7 Gauss points and the sub-triangle technique (Ghorashi et al, 2011) is used for the tip-element by 13 Gauss points in each triangle, however the split element contains 6×6 Gauss points for the horizontal crack problems and the sub-triangle technique is used by 13 Gauss points in each triangle for the inclined crack problems. The SIFs are evaluated using interaction integral (Yau and Wang, 1984), wherein the crack tip element is not considered in the calculation.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%