1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(96)70085-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Orthodontic and orthopedic effects of Activator, Activator-HG combination, and Bass appliances: A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
14
0
12

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
14
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…[12][13][14] In case of conventional activator being used, the retractor group of muscles will force the mandible backwards, whereas the construction bite taken will prevent the dentoalveolar segment to react to the muscular forces; hence, the lower incisors tend to procline which is a normal compensation for a class II skeletal pattern. 15 Many activator and activator headgear studies 6,[8][9][10][16][17][18] have reported a retroclination of upper incisors. A more pronounced retrusion of the upper incisors with the activator compared with the activator headgear has been reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[12][13][14] In case of conventional activator being used, the retractor group of muscles will force the mandible backwards, whereas the construction bite taken will prevent the dentoalveolar segment to react to the muscular forces; hence, the lower incisors tend to procline which is a normal compensation for a class II skeletal pattern. 15 Many activator and activator headgear studies 6,[8][9][10][16][17][18] have reported a retroclination of upper incisors. A more pronounced retrusion of the upper incisors with the activator compared with the activator headgear has been reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10][11] However, only some studies have included data from untreated class II as control group. [6][7][8] 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1003 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…;ZIAJA, 1989;BOLMGREN;MOSHIRI, 1986;CHANG et al, 1989;CURA et al, 1996;DERRINGER, 1990;DEVINCENZO, 1991;FREITAS, B.V., 1996;FREUNTHALLER, 1967;GHAFARI;HENRIQUES, 1997;JAKOBSSON;PAULIN, 1990;JANSON, I., 1977JANSON, I., , 1978KEELING, 1998;LANGE et al, 1995;ALLEN, 1990;MARTINS, J.C.R., 1997;MEACH, 1966;MILLS, J.R., 1991;OP HEIJ;CALLAERT;OPDEBEECK, 1989;SCHULHOF;ENGEL, 1982;THUER;BURGIN, 1989;TSAMTSOURIS;VEDRENNE, 1983;PROFFIT, 1998;PHILLIPS, 1997), demonstraram que o ângulo SNB aumentou com a utilização do Bionator.…”
Section: Componente Mandibularmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este resultado é substanciado, na literatura, por diversos autores (ALMEIDA, CHANG et al, 1989;CURA et al, 1996;DERRINGER, 1990;HENRIQUES, 1997;JAKOBSSON;PAULIN, 1990;LANGE et al, 1995;MILLS, J.R., 1991;PANCHERZ, 1984 BUSCHANG et al, 1988;DRELICH, 1948;HENRIQUES et al, 1998;KARLSEN, 1994;MAIA, 1998;MCNAMARA, J.A., JR., 1981;NGAN;BYCZEC;SCHEIK, 1997). Não obstante a variação no crescimento condilar possa provocar uma rotação do corpo mandibular, um crescimento vertical maior na área dos molares pode rotacionar a mandíbula no sentido horário, aumentando a altura facial anteroinferior (SCHUDY, 1965).…”
Section: Relação Maxilomandibularunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation