Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Origins of the edge shadowing artefact in medical ultrasound imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The image formation process of ultrasound images is bound to the propagation and interaction of waves in tissues of various acoustic impedances (Steel et al, 2004). More precisely, at the boundary of two materials, the wave energy is transmitted, reflected, dispersed and or diffracted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The image formation process of ultrasound images is bound to the propagation and interaction of waves in tissues of various acoustic impedances (Steel et al, 2004). More precisely, at the boundary of two materials, the wave energy is transmitted, reflected, dispersed and or diffracted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the margins of a structure with different acoustic impedance compared to the tissue around it and with a highly curved surface (in this case degenerated facet joint and ligamentum flavum with soft tissues surrounding it) an artefact named lateral shadowing [3,4] (or retraction shadowing [5]) appears. Marginal waves get refracted at the edges of the structure, causing a shadow at the margins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well as geometric distortions, ultrasound images undergo well-known intensity distortions, arising from wave behaviour and the true beam line structure [9]. In future it would be insightful to consolidate these two distortion contributions by direct comparison between ray predictions and more sophisticated finite-element models of the full acoustic field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%