2017
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/797/1/012002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric distortion of area in medical ultrasound images

Abstract: Medical ultrasound scanners are typically calibrated to the soft tissue average of 1540 m s −1 . In regions of different sound speed, for example organs and tumours, the B-mode image then becomes a distortion of the true tissue cross-section, due to the misrepresentation of length and refraction. We develop a ray model to predict the geometrical distortion of a general elliptical object with atypical speed of sound, and quantify the ensuing image distortion as a function of the key parameters, including the sp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the visible artifacts and geometric distortion in sil-iocne10 D might be due to the discrepancies between the SOS in water versus silicone which can cause high refraction of sound waves at the boundary and result in misinterpretation of the length of an object and thus, distorted images. [38][39][40] The varying brightness in PVA scans might be due to the physical crosslinking and consequent crystal formation in the polymer bulk dependent on the applied FTCs. 30 Meanwhile, varying the applied FTCs did not significantly affect the quality of the generated scans, neither did it affect the pixel gray values, which agrees with previous work reporting a 1.4% increase in the SOS values between FTC1 to FTC5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the visible artifacts and geometric distortion in sil-iocne10 D might be due to the discrepancies between the SOS in water versus silicone which can cause high refraction of sound waves at the boundary and result in misinterpretation of the length of an object and thus, distorted images. [38][39][40] The varying brightness in PVA scans might be due to the physical crosslinking and consequent crystal formation in the polymer bulk dependent on the applied FTCs. 30 Meanwhile, varying the applied FTCs did not significantly affect the quality of the generated scans, neither did it affect the pixel gray values, which agrees with previous work reporting a 1.4% increase in the SOS values between FTC1 to FTC5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%