2016
DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n2p1045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Organs and carcass non-integrant components of Holstein calves, slaughtered at different weights, held in different finishing systems

Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate the weight of the empty body and non-integrant components of Holstein calves carcass, kept in confinement system or pasture, slaughtered at different weights. We used 43 Holstein calves, entire, age and initial body weight of approximately 58 days and 57 kg, distributed entirely at random in confinement or cultivated pasture. In feeding systems, it was prestipulated four slaughter weights (SW -140, 180, 220 and 260 kg of live weight). In confinement, were provided co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weight of internal organs, according to Dias et al (2016), follows body weight in dairy calves, which may explain much of the results for internal organ characteristics. In addition, according Perón et al (1993), heart and lungs maintain their integrity because they have a priority in nutrient use, regardless of the intake level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The weight of internal organs, according to Dias et al (2016), follows body weight in dairy calves, which may explain much of the results for internal organ characteristics. In addition, according Perón et al (1993), heart and lungs maintain their integrity because they have a priority in nutrient use, regardless of the intake level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The decrease in the weight of the small intestine, however, can be explained by DMI reduction, which could have reduced metabolic activity in this organ, altering its size (Missio et al, 2009b). In general, it has been verified that the weight of the large intestine, on the other hand, is not altered by the supply of different diets and/or feeding systems (Dias et al, 2016), which possibly is associated with less metabolic activity in relation to small intestine, which has the absorption of water as one of the main functions (Gasaway et al, 1976).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%