Abstract:Organ donation among the world community today is not a new phenomenon. The noble act of organ donation by donors that at times, has no blood relations has enabled many patients with chronic diseases to earn a second chance in life. The same scenario also takes place in Malaysia in which awareness of organ donation to help parties in need is not new. Many citizen of Malaysia is aware that their contribution gives "new life" to the needy. This little "scarifies" indirectly shows that Malaysian people put a high… Show more
“…Furthermore, most Malays refused to donate a kidney due to the lack of transparent disclosure or discussion on this issue [17]. This finding concurs with national reports that show Malays donated organs the least among the three main ethnicities [3].…”
PurposeThe purpose of this study was to identify factors that affect willingness to donate kidneys posthumously among Malaysians.Design/methodology/approachA questionnaire-based cross-sectional study assessing demographics, attitude, spirituality, knowledge and willingness to donate a kidney was conducted among adult Malaysians with oral informed consent. The total number of samples was 1,001 respondents. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed.FindingsA total of 29.17% (n = 292) were willing to donate kidneys, while the remaining 70.83% (n = 709) were not. The mean spirituality score was 80.95 ± 13.79 (maximum score 100), mean attitude score was 52.88 ± 8.074 (maximum score 70) and mean knowledge score was 1.84 ± 0.99 (maximum score 5). A higher score demonstrated a stronger spiritual level, positive attitude and better knowledge. Factors affecting willingness to donate a kidney were ethnicity (odds ratio [OR] = 15.625, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.043–0.094) and attitude toward kidney donation score (OR = 0.924, 95% CI = 0.902–0.945).Originality/valueCulture-specific steps to improve programs that may contribute toward improving kidney donation posthumously among Malaysians should be developed. Results drawn from this work demonstrate that policymakers, health-care workers and stakeholders should work together to promote effective policies and program implementation to reduce the ever-increasing gap between the need and shortage crisis of kidney donation.
“…Furthermore, most Malays refused to donate a kidney due to the lack of transparent disclosure or discussion on this issue [17]. This finding concurs with national reports that show Malays donated organs the least among the three main ethnicities [3].…”
PurposeThe purpose of this study was to identify factors that affect willingness to donate kidneys posthumously among Malaysians.Design/methodology/approachA questionnaire-based cross-sectional study assessing demographics, attitude, spirituality, knowledge and willingness to donate a kidney was conducted among adult Malaysians with oral informed consent. The total number of samples was 1,001 respondents. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed.FindingsA total of 29.17% (n = 292) were willing to donate kidneys, while the remaining 70.83% (n = 709) were not. The mean spirituality score was 80.95 ± 13.79 (maximum score 100), mean attitude score was 52.88 ± 8.074 (maximum score 70) and mean knowledge score was 1.84 ± 0.99 (maximum score 5). A higher score demonstrated a stronger spiritual level, positive attitude and better knowledge. Factors affecting willingness to donate a kidney were ethnicity (odds ratio [OR] = 15.625, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.043–0.094) and attitude toward kidney donation score (OR = 0.924, 95% CI = 0.902–0.945).Originality/valueCulture-specific steps to improve programs that may contribute toward improving kidney donation posthumously among Malaysians should be developed. Results drawn from this work demonstrate that policymakers, health-care workers and stakeholders should work together to promote effective policies and program implementation to reduce the ever-increasing gap between the need and shortage crisis of kidney donation.
“…A study on organ donation in Malaysia reported that Malay and Muslim were unsure or unwilling to donate their organs as compared to Chinese and Buddhist (Abidin et al, 2013). The Malays face the dilemma of being sceptical of whether their religion permits them to make organ donations (Noordin et al, 2012). As the majority of students were Malay (96.5%) and Muslim (97.7%) in this study, it was quite challenging to justify whether the same scenario applies to tooth donation as there was a small number of students representing other ethnicities (3.5%) and religion (2.3%).…”
Extracted human teeth is the preferred choice for preclinical training as it simulates the clinical scenario as compared to artificial teeth. However, the increase in the number of dental undergraduates might cause an imbalance in the demand and supply of extracted human teeth. Not only that, extracted human teeth are also needed by researchers for the development of dentistry (e.g. dental pulp stem cells research). This study aimed to evaluate the socio-demographic and preclinical training factors associated with the willingness to donate teeth among dental students of a selected university in Malaysia. The results of thisstudy show that the majority of students were willing to donate their teeth after extraction for educational purposes, followed by keeping their tooth, leaving it behind as clinical waste anddonating it to research. Further research is recommended to determine the willingness of the community or public to donate their teeth to meet the demand for dental schools and researchers in Malaysia.
“…10,11 Another evidence of traditional cultural values influencing people's decision to donate tissue/organs is the statistics obtained from 2000 to 2010 by National Transplant Resource Centre, Kuala Lumpur, which reported that donation among the Malay community (the dominant ethnic group in Malaysia) contributed to only 6.36% of the total organ donation as compared to 61.86% by Chinese and 31.78% by Indians; the study cited the Malay community's perception that their religion, Islam, did not permit them to donate tissue/organs as the primary reason for their low donation rates. 12 Thirdly, although most healthcare professionals support tissue donation, not many of them have registered to pledge for tissue donation. This attitude of healthcare professionals may be attributed to several reasons: 1) lack of awareness that tissue donation is by opt-in system (MTERA), and not an opt-out system (HOTA) for organs; 2) lack of information about what is required of them to join the registry; and 3) signing up as a pledger is not a priority.…”
Introduction: In Singapore, tissue donation is covered under the Medical (Therapy, Education and Research) Act. The objective of this study is to review the demographic and psychosocial factors, which may cause hesitation/unwillingness amongst healthcare professionals towards tissue donation. Materials and Methods: A survey comprising 18-items was conducted at the Singapore General Hospital and National Heart Centre Singapore. A total of 521 individuals participated in the survey. Descriptive statistics were performed for the demographic profiles of participants, the factors leading to the support of tissue donation, reasons for hesitation/reluctance to donate tissue and motivating factors to discuss tissue donation with next-of-kin. Pearson’s chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were employed to assess possible association between various factors and support towards tissue donation. Analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences V.21.0 software. Results: A total of 64.9% of participants had heard about skin donation; 48.9% had heard about heart valve donation; 4.5% were tissue pledgers. The primary reason for pro-donation was the altruism of “improving someone’s quality of life”. However, a majority stated they “can decide this in the later part of life” as their main reason for hesitation; 82.3% were willing to discuss their tissue donation wish with next-of-kin, while 53.1% were likely to make the decision of donation on behalf of their deceased next-of-kin. Conclusion: Results highlighted important psychosocial and professional factors that influence the hesitation/reluctance towards donation. Hence, there is a need to re-strategise educational efforts in accordance with the target audiences and address specific misconceptions and concerns.
Key words: Heart valve banking, Tissue donation, Skin allografts, Skin banking
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.