2020
DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2020.1826545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral submucous fibrosis and its impact on psychological stress: a case-control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, the analysis of the psychological conditions revealed that our sample did not report lower psychological wellbeing, compared to results observed in the Italian normative study [ 13 ] and other studies which have used the PGWB-S [ 29 ]. Such a result could seem to be in contrast with the available literature also related to the Italian COVID-19 outbreak [ 30 ], which describes the significant negative impact of lockdown on psychological health, detectable in the shape of post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, anger [ 4 ], and changes in sexuality [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…Lastly, the analysis of the psychological conditions revealed that our sample did not report lower psychological wellbeing, compared to results observed in the Italian normative study [ 13 ] and other studies which have used the PGWB-S [ 29 ]. Such a result could seem to be in contrast with the available literature also related to the Italian COVID-19 outbreak [ 30 ], which describes the significant negative impact of lockdown on psychological health, detectable in the shape of post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, anger [ 4 ], and changes in sexuality [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…The total score was compared with a six-item scale in which values less than 60 reflected severe distress; scores between 60 and 69 defined moderate distress; scores between 70 and 89 meant without distress; and values greater than 90 indicates a positive well-being status. For the reliability analysis of the instrument, Cronbach’s Alpha was used, yielding a value of 0.87, which indicated a good validity of the data [ 29 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internal consistency of the PGWB-S test applied to the population in our study was examined with Cronbach’s alpha (α), which should be at least 0.7 to indicate the satisfactory homogeneity of the items within the total scale [ 28 ]. In our study, Cronbach’s alpha for reliability was 0.87, indicating good reliability and content validity [ 29 ]. A critical value for significance of p < 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was considered significant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%