Oral hygiene and caries

Ht, Bellini; Arneberg, Pål; Fr, von der Fehr

doi:10.3109/00016358109162287

Cited by 121 publications

(82 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…There is no strong evidence of a clear relationship between oral cleanliness and levels of dental caries 192 . The Health Education Authority in England concluded that 'although caries cannot develop without the presence of plaque, plaque removal by tooth brushing cannot in itself be advocated for caries prevention.…”

Section: Promotion Of Good Oral Hygienementioning

confidence: 99%

Diet, nutrition and the prevention of dental diseases

Moynihan

Petersen

2004

Public Health Nutr.

687

582

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Promotion Of Good Oral Hygienementioning

confidence: 99%

Diet, nutrition and the prevention of dental diseases

Moynihan

Petersen

2004

Public Health Nutr.

687

582

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…But the relationship between toothbrushing and oral cleanliness on the one hand and dental caries on the other is equivocal 132 . Bellini, Arneberg and von der Fehr 132 concluded that toothbrushing habits had a questionable effect on caries.…”

Section: Oral Cleanliness and Dental Cariesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Food transitions in the 20th–21st century

Bengoa¹

2001

PHN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dental caries is a highly prevalent chronic disease and its consequences cause a lot of pain and suffering. Sugars, particularly sucrose, are the most important dietary aetiological cause of caries. Both the frequency of consumption and total amount of sugars is important in the aetiology of caries.`The evidence establishing sugars as an aetiological factor in dental caries is overwhelming. The foundation of this lies in the multiplicity of studies rather than the power of any one.'1 . That statement by the British Nutrition Foundation's Task Force on Oral Health, Diet and Other Factors, sums up the relationship between sugars and caries in Europe. There is no evidence that sugars naturally incorporated in the cellular structure of foods (intrinsic sugars) or lactose in milk or milk products (milk sugars) have adverse effects on health. Foods rich in starch, without the addition of sugars, play a small role in coronal dental caries. The intake of extrinsic sugars beyond four times a day leads to an increase risk of dental caries. The current dose-response relationship between caries and extrinsic sugars suggests that the sugars levels above 60 g/person/day for teenagers and adults increases the rate of caries. For pre-school and young children the intakes should be proportional to those for teenagers; about 30 g/person/day for pre-school children. Fluoride, particularly in toothpastes, is a very important preventive agent against dental caries. Toothbrushing without fluorides has little effect on caries. As additional fluoride to that currently available in toothpaste does not appear to be benefiting the teeth of the majority of people, the main strategy to further reduce the levels of caries, is reducing the frequency of sugars intakes in the diet. Dental erosion rates are considered to be increasing. The aetiology is acids in foods and drinks and to a much lesser extent from regurgitation.

show abstract

“…By contrast, fluoridated dentifrices reduce caries only in subjects that maintain effective oral hygiene (2,11,38). A significant relationship between caries experience and oral hygiene has been apparent in the United States and western Europe since 1980 (3,6), a generation following the introduction of fluoridated dentifrices in 1965 (40). Adults who are older and grew up using nonfluoridated dentifrices showed no association of caries experience with oral hygiene.…”

mentioning

confidence: 98%