2018
DOI: 10.1159/000486661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral Brush Liquid-Based Cytology: A Study of Concordance between a Cytotechnologist and a Cytopathologist

Abstract: Objective: Oral cancer accounts for almost 40% of all cancers in the Indian subcontinent. Techniques like oral scrape cytology are helpful in early diagnosis of premalignant lesion and thus prevention of malignant transformation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of cytotechnologists in assessing the adequacy and preliminary diagnostic accuracy of oral brush liquid-based cytology. Study Design: 110 oral brush liquid-based cytology smears were prospectively screened by a cytotechnologist … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we recommend the strategy of cytology-based head and neck cancer surgery when a trained cytopathologist is available and is introduced to this therapeutic concept. As Pandey et al [ 28 ] found a high level of concordance without any significant difference when evaluating the performance of cytotechnologists and cytopathologists in assessing the adequacy and preliminary diagnostic accuracy of oral brush liquid-based cytology, it represents an alternative to involve experiences cytotechnologists in the evaluation of oral LBC specimens when a trained cytopathologist is not available. Even an automated analysis of LBC samples of the head and neck region using artificial intelligence has been investigated with promising preliminary results giving reasons for further studies [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we recommend the strategy of cytology-based head and neck cancer surgery when a trained cytopathologist is available and is introduced to this therapeutic concept. As Pandey et al [ 28 ] found a high level of concordance without any significant difference when evaluating the performance of cytotechnologists and cytopathologists in assessing the adequacy and preliminary diagnostic accuracy of oral brush liquid-based cytology, it represents an alternative to involve experiences cytotechnologists in the evaluation of oral LBC specimens when a trained cytopathologist is not available. Even an automated analysis of LBC samples of the head and neck region using artificial intelligence has been investigated with promising preliminary results giving reasons for further studies [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researcher performed a computerized analysis of cytology to remove the subjective bias and improve the inter-observer agreement. [7,20,21] The histomorphometric analysis of exfoliative cells from normal mucosa and oral premalignant lesions in these studies was found to be effective in differentiating between dysplastic and non-dysplastic cells, thereby helping in the diagnosis of the dysplastic lesion. These reported a decrease in CA and CD; an increase in NA, and ND, and an increase NACA, and NDCD ratio in dysplastic cells as compared to normal cells.…”
Section: Comparison Of Cytomorphometric Detection Of Dysplasia With N...mentioning
confidence: 92%