Options for Near-Term Phaseout of CO₂ Emissions from Coal Use in the United States

Abstract

The global climate problem becomes tractable if CO(2) emissions from coal use are phased out rapidly and emissions from unconventional fossil fuels (e.g., oil shale and tar sands) are prohibited. This paper outlines technology options for phasing out coal emissions in the United States by approximately 2030. We focus on coal for physical and practical reasons and on the U.S. because it is most responsible for accumulated fossil fuel CO(2) in the atmosphere today, specifically targeting electricity production, which is the primary use of coal. While we recognize that coal emissions must be phased out globally, we believe U.S. leadership is essential. A major challenge for reducing U.S. emissions is that coal provides the largest proportion of base load power, i.e., power satisfying minimum electricity demand. Because this demand is relatively constant and coal has a high carbon intensity, utility carbon emissions are largely due to coal. The current U.S. electric grid incorporates little renewable power, most of which is not base load power. However, this can readily be changed within the next 2-3 decades. Eliminating coal emissions also requires improved efficiency, a "smart grid", additional energy storage, and advanced nuclear power. Any further coal usage must be accompanied by carbon capture and storage (CCS). We suggest that near-term emphasis should be on efficiency measures and substitution of coal-fired power by renewables and third-generation nuclear plants, since these technologies have been successfully demonstrated at the relevant (commercial) scale. Beyond 2030, these measures can be supplemented by CCS at power plants and, as needed, successfully demonstrated fourth-generation reactors. We conclude that U.S. coal emissions could be phased out by 2030 using existing technologies or ones that could be commercially competitive with coal within about a decade. Elimination of fossil fuel subsidies and a substantial rising price on carbon emissions are the root requirements for a clean, emissions-free future.

Prevented Mortality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Historical and Projected Nuclear Power

“…While most of the highly nuclear-dependent countries have affirmed their plans to continue development of nuclear power after the Fukushima accident, several have announced that they will either temporarily suspend plans for new plants or completely phase out existing plants . Serious questions remain about safety, proliferation, and disposal of radioactive waste, which we have discussed in some detail elsewhere …”

Life cycle assessment of thermochemical energy storage integration concepts for a concentrating solar power plant

“…17 CSP plants (together with low-cost TES) generally present Global Warming Potential (GWP) of less than 40 g CO 2eq /kWh and Energy Payback Time (EPBT) less than 1 year, 17 indicating significantly reduced environmental impacts compared to conventional power plants based on fossil sources. 18,19 Relatively fewer LCA works in the literature include or focus on the TES materials/systems for CSP plants. In terms of TES materials, it has been reported that the environmental impacts could be reduced by switching from synthetic molten salts to mined salts, 20,21 to recycled industrial ceramics 22 or to concrete).…”

Projecting the UK's Future Electricity Supply Mix: A Tool for Generating Sustainable Future Energy Scenarios

“…from construction to decommissioning and therefore includes maintenance periodic component replacement plus machinery use). The initial "emergy" (intrinsic energy stored in raw materials) also known as embodied energy has been excluded (Kharecha, Kutscher et al 2010).…”