Prevented Mortality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Historical and Projected Nuclear Power

Abstract

In the aftermath of the March 2011 accident at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, the future contribution of nuclear power to the global energy supply has become somewhat uncertain. Because nuclear power is an abundant, low-carbon source of base-load power, it could make a large contribution to mitigation of global climate change and air pollution. Using historical production data, we calculate that global nuclear power has prevented an average of 1.84 million air pollution-related deaths and 64 gigatonnes of CO2-equivalent (GtCO2-eq) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that would have resulted from fossil fuel burning. On the basis of global projection data that take into account the effects of the Fukushima accident, we find that nuclear power could additionally prevent an average of 420,000-7.04 million deaths and 80-240 GtCO2-eq emissions due to fossil fuels by midcentury, depending on which fuel it replaces. By contrast, we assess that large-scale expansion of unconstrained natural gas use would not mitigate the climate problem and would cause far more deaths than expansion of nuclear power.

Nuclear power can reduce emissions and maintain a strong economy: Rating Australia’s optimal future electricity-generation mix by technologies and policies

“…We selected the cost and sustainability indicators for the MCDMA carefully based on the guidelines of the International Atomic Energy Agency in cooperation with the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA), the International Energy Agency (IEA), Eurostat and the European Environment Agency (EEA) [37], which are relevant to the context of Australia. These were: (1) levelized cost of electricity (which is the minimum cost of electricity at which an electricity producer can sell and still secure an economic return), including carbon pricing between 2013 ($23 tonne CO 2 -e À1 ) and 2050 ($140 tonne CO 2 -e À1 ) [24], and additional costs [31], (2) greenhouse-gas emissions [38], (3) air pollutants Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering, 2009 [22,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48], (4) land transformation [39,46,[49][50][51][52][53], (5) freshwater consumption [41,48,50,[54][55][56][57][58][59], (6) safety costs [21,60,61] (the probability of severe accidents and the impact of them), (7) solid-waste generation [41,48,[62][63][64][65]…”

An investigation of the evaporation behavior of bioliquid in the pores and its application to hybrid coal combining biomass with coal

“…As oil price hikes and instability of nuclear power plants have persisted recently, the volume of coal in use has been on a constant rise due to a relatively smooth supply and fewer problems arising from its use [1,2]. However, the continued use of coal in coal-fired power plants for energy generation will constantly increase the emissions of carbon dioxide and other pollutants and ultimately accelerate global warming [3,4].…”

Why nuclear energy is essential to reduce anthropogenic greenhouse gas emission rates

“…Numerous scientific comparisons have shown that nuclear fission is among the energy sources that are least polluting and have the lowest overall environmental impact [10]. Operating nuclear power plants do not produce air pollution nor do they emit CO 2 .…”