2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimum detailed design of reinforced concrete continuous beams using Genetic Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
42
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Even the one of the most advanced approaches, proposed by Govindaraj and Ramasamy [15,16], has its limitations. Although based on the most relaxed constraints, allowing as much as three different bar diameters in the same cross section, this method uses previously developed data base of possible reinforcement patterns is based on assumption that the number of rows is limited to three and the number of bars per row is limited to five.…”
Section: Technical Sciences 2013 9(1) 53-60mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even the one of the most advanced approaches, proposed by Govindaraj and Ramasamy [15,16], has its limitations. Although based on the most relaxed constraints, allowing as much as three different bar diameters in the same cross section, this method uses previously developed data base of possible reinforcement patterns is based on assumption that the number of rows is limited to three and the number of bars per row is limited to five.…”
Section: Technical Sciences 2013 9(1) 53-60mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) presents several different feasible solutions for the problem proposed by Govindaraj and Ramasamy [21]. For rectangular cross section with optimal dimensions b/h = 25/32,5 cm, calculated required area of steel is 9,32 cm 2 and the next step is finding adequate reinforcement pattern, i.e.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solution a), proposed by the authors of [21], is obtained by the genetic algorithm in which the only criterion for the reinforcement pattern is minimal necessary amount of steel for required bearing capacity. Although this solution is mathematically the best one, its applicability from the practical point of view is questionable because the proposed pattern is relatively complicated (consisting of three different diameters), which is confirmed by value C r = 2,56.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of the optimal dimensioning of reinforced concrete beams has been considered for many years (Camp et al 2003;Govindaraj, Ramasamy 2005;Senouci, Al-Ansari 2009;Martí, Vidosa 2010;Mohači et al 2010). In this paper, an optimization procedure is given that aims for the adopted cross-section to satisfy the conditions of the ultimate limit state according to the criterion of minimum price of the component materials.…”
Section: Fig 9 Cross-section Of Tested Beamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Camp et al (2003) developed a procedure for the optimization of reinforced concrete frames using GA as recommended by the ACI. Govindaraj and Ramasamy (2005) developed an algorithm for the detailed calculation and optimization of continuous reinforced concrete beams. In their paper, Sobolev and Amirjanov (2010) presented an algorithm based on genetic algorithms, which makes it possible to model the packing density of the aggregate in concrete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%