2015
DOI: 10.17559/tv-20140210121432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantitative method for evaluating applicability of designed reinforcement pattern

Abstract: Original scientific paper Methods for optimal design of the reinforced concrete structures presented in literature usually do not consider detailed reinforcement pattern, or if they do, it is either too generalized or the optimal solution is always the one with the lowest amount of the reinforcement, disregarding its applicability in reality, at the building site. In order to develop adequate apparatus for numerical estimation and easier choice of the most appropriate solution from the practical point of view,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But in reality, when faced with a variety of possible and theoretically acceptable solutions, a designer is supposed to find a compromise between the exactness and the applicability at the building site. Because of that, it is recommendable to use some additional criteria for estimating the applicability of a given reinforcement pattern, such as the one proposed in [24].…”
Section: Applicability Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But in reality, when faced with a variety of possible and theoretically acceptable solutions, a designer is supposed to find a compromise between the exactness and the applicability at the building site. Because of that, it is recommendable to use some additional criteria for estimating the applicability of a given reinforcement pattern, such as the one proposed in [24].…”
Section: Applicability Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these studies regarding design optimization of RC building components or frames are conformed to the guidelines decided by the various standards of different countries such as Indian standard (IS 456) [7,11,20,26], American standard (ACI 318, ASCE7) [13,17, 21-25, 28, 29], European standard (Eurocode 2) [15,27]and Australian standard (AS 3600) [14], Brazilian standard (NBR 6118) [12]. Apart from these, RazmaraShooli et al [30] have proposed a GA-PSO based algorithm for performance-based design optimization of a special moment-resisting frames based on guidelines provided by American standards (ATC-40, FEMA 356, ASCE-7 and ASCE-41).In these literatures the researchers used geometry of beam, column, amount of reinforcement, cost of material and shuttering as their optimization variable.In the problems regarding optimized design of RC components, optimizing the distribution of reinforcement are also an important issue [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Tackling magnetoencephalography with particle swarm optimization'. International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation, 1(1-2),[32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] [40] IS 456(2000).Plain and Reinforced Concrete -Code of Practice, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India [41] IS 875 (Part I) (1987). Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake)for buildings and structures: part 1 dead loads -unit weights of building material and stored materials, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India [42] IS 875 (Part II) (1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, productivity rates for man-hours calculation for in-situ reinforcement fixing are based only on total amount of the reinforcing steel, regardless of the pattern complexity which can greatly affect time needed for proper placing, tying and control. Because of that, patterns consisting of 12Ø16 and 3Ø32 bars, respectively, have exactly the same total amount of steel and consequently the same theoretical number of man-hours needed for placing and fixing, although it is obvious that such result would not be realistic, as was proven in studies [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%